ArticleGene therapy2026
Building a gene editing lexicon: a model for rare and inherited disorders.
Article in Gene therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
As more advanced cell and gene therapies, including gene editing technologies, progress through drug development, there is increased emphasis on the importance of stakeholders, including people living with disease, caregivers, and healthcare professionals, to communicate using clear, accurate, and consistent language. Lexicons explaining advanced gene therapies will support patients' and clinicians' understanding, enabling shared decision-making and informed consent for clinical trial participation and, in the future, healthcare choice. Early lexicon development is crucial for standardizing communication across clinical sites, geographies, clinicians, and patients. A lexicon for clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats-associated protein 9 (CRISPR-Cas9) gene editing for hemophilia was developed using comprehensive methodologies, gathering insight through qualitative research and in-depth interviews, language audits, and workshops, with input from lived experience experts, leading clinicians in hemophilia, gene therapy experts, and scientific and patient organizations. This lexicon serves as a gold standard template for future comprehensive patient lexicon development strategy and could be applied to other therapeutic areas where treatments are being developed and standardized, or where accessible vocabulary for patients, healthcare professionals, and the affected community is lacking. This communication highlights the need for lexicon development for advanced gene editing treatments across therapeutic areas to support standardized understanding and enhance communication.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.