ArticleBMC oral health2026
Evaluation of TMJ bone microarchitecture in malocclusion and tooth loss using fractal dimension analysis.
Article in BMC oral health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThis study aimed to investigate the effects of malocclusion and tooth loss on the trabecular bone microarchitecture of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) condylar head using fractal dimension (FD) analysis on panoramic radiographs.
methodsA total of 1,061 individuals (684 females, 377 males) were included. Malocclusion and tooth loss were determined through clinical examination. Fractal analysis was performed on 50 × 50 pixel regions of interest from both TMJ condyles using ImageJ software. Statistical analyses included independent t-tests, chi-square tests, and two-way ANOVA to assess the main and interaction effects of malocclusion, tooth loss, and TMJ side on FD values.
resultsMalocclusion showed no significant effect on FD values (p > 0.05). However, tooth loss significantly affected the trabecular bone structure (p < 0.001), with a notable interaction between the TMJ side and the side of tooth loss. Individuals with unilateral tooth loss exhibited significantly reduced FD values in the contralateral condylar head compared to those without tooth loss (p < 0.001). This contralateral FD reduction may be associated with asymmetric functional loading following unilateral tooth loss; however, chewing side preference was not specifically evaluated in this study.
conclusionsWhile malocclusion did not significantly influence TMJ trabecular architecture, tooth loss—particularly unilateral—was associated with distinct microstructural alterations detectable through fractal analysis. Early prosthetic rehabilitation following tooth loss is therefore essential to prevent long-term structural changes in the TMJ. Fractal analysis of panoramic radiographs provides a valuable, non-invasive method for evaluating TMJ bone integrity in clinical and research applications. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.