Trial reportBMC health services research2026
Effectiveness of an artificial intelligence-assisted training program on cleaning competency among hospital environmental service staff.
Trial report in BMC health services research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence in infection prevention and control education: toward intelligent, real-time clinical learning systems.Frontiers in public health · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHealthcare-associated infections remain a major patient-safety threat, and environmental contamination is a key driver. Hospital cleaning staff are essential for prevention, yet conventional training lacks standardization and real-time feedback. We evaluated whether an artificial intelligence (AI) system with live monitoring and voice prompts improves terminal cleaning competency.
methodsWe randomly assigned 60 environmental service staff from Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Hangzhou, China, to either conventional instruction or AI-assisted training. The AI platform used computer vision and deep-learning algorithms to track cleaning tasks in real time against a predefined nine-item procedure and provided instant voice corrections when deviations occurred. Competency was assessed post-training under identical, feedback-free conditions, and a score of ≥ 7 was required to pass.
resultsMedian competency scores were 7.8 (IQR: 7.4–8.4) in the AI group versus 5.8 (IQR: 5.4–7.4) in controls. All 30 AI-trained staff passed, compared with 9 (30%) controls. Largest gains occurred in edge cleaning, S-pattern mopping and high-touch surface disinfection.
conclusionsReal-time AI supervision significantly enhances cleaning competency and procedure adherence, offering a scalable and standardized approach to improve environmental hygiene and infection prevention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.