Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41826985›Full record

ReviewCritical care (London, England)2026

Machine learning in ARDS: an intensivist's guide to artificial intelligence applications.

Romain Lombardi, Mihir Chaturvedi, Mathieu Jozwiak, Mayank Garg

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Critical care (London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Romain LombardiIntensive Care Unit, Pasteur 2 University Hospital, 30 Voie Romaine, Nice, 06000, France. lombardi.r@chu-nice.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1101-8153
Mihir ChaturvediKoita Centre for Digital Health - Ashoka (KCDH-A), Trivedi School of Biosciences, Ashoka University, Sonipat, India.
Mathieu JozwiakIntensive Care Unit, Archet 1 University Hospital, 151 Route de Saint-Antoine, Nice, 06200, France.
Mayank GargKoita Centre for Digital Health - Ashoka (KCDH-A), Trivedi School of Biosciences, Ashoka University, Sonipat, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAcute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) is a heterogeneous, life-threatening condition with persistent diagnostic uncertainty, limited causal treatments, and high mortality in intensive care. ARDS management remains largely supportive, and conventional scores and trial designs have struggled to account for its biological and clinical heterogeneity.

objectiveThis narrative review summarizes current and emerging applications of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in ARDS and mechanical ventilation. It focuses on how Machine Learning (ML) can refine early risk prediction, diagnosis, phenotyping, management and outcome prediction, while outlining the strengths, weaknesses and nuances of these applications.

findingsML models using electronic health records, imaging, physiological waveforms and omics data show strong performance for predicting ARDS onset, enabling early diagnosis, optimising management and forecasting outcomes. These models show performance equivalent to and often outperform traditional guidelines and scores. However, most of these models remain limited to the research setting and show limited clinical adoption. CHALLENGES: Most studies are retrospective, single-center and lack rigorous external validation, limiting generalizability and real-world impact. Additional challenges include data quality and bias, poor calibration and scarce decision-curve analyses, limited interpretability, and the absence of prospective trials demonstrating that AI-guided strategies improve patient-centered outcomes.

conclusionML has substantial potential to advance precision medicine in ARDS by enabling predictive and prognostic enrichment and supporting personalized ventilatory care. Its safe and equitable deployment, however, requires standardized methodology, transparent reporting, multicenter prospective validation, and clinician-led governance to ensure that AI augments rather than replaces expert clinical judgment.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceMachine LearningRespiratory Distress SyndromeHumansPredictive Learning ModelsRespiration, ArtificialSoft ComputingARDSArtificial intelligenceCritical careMachine learningMechanical ventilationReview

Identifiers

PMID41826985
PMCPMC13101189

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.