ArticleCritical care (London, England)2026
Integrating intestinal microbiome and urinary metabolome data to predict secondary infection in critically ill patients.
Article in Critical care (London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Metabodeconplus-An R Package for Automated Deconvolution and Alignment of 1D NMR Metabolomics Data.Metabolites · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSecondary infection (SI), including ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) and bloodstream infection (BSI), represents a major complication in critically ill patients. Current clinical risk stratification approaches prove inadequate for timely and precise identification of at-risk patients. This study identifies intestinal microbiome and urinary metabolome characteristics (“multi-omics data”) associated with SI occurrence, investigates convergence of the respiratory microbiome with the intestinal microbiome, and determines whether multi-omics integration enhances prognostic discrimination for patients at risk of developing SI.
methodsWe analyzed data from mechanically ventilated patients from two cohorts: University Hospital Cologne (UHC), Germany, and Columbia University Medical Center (CUMC), New York, United States. The core dataset (n = 88; 64 UHC and 24 CUMC) assessed multi-omics integration for SI prediction, with an UHC subset (n = 55) providing more comprehensive clinical and microbiome characterization. Baseline intestinal and respiratory microbiome, as well as urinary metabolome data were collected within 48 h of intensive care unit admission or intubation using 16 S ribosomal ribonucleic acid (rRNA) sequencing and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy. SI was defined as new-onset BSI or VAP occurring ≥ 48 h after enrollment. Regression and classification models compared clinical-only approaches with integrated multi-omics models using model selection criteria, area under the curve (AUC), and Matthews correlation coefficients.
resultsSI occurred in 28% of patients, with prior antibiotic exposure associated with SI (84% vs. 41%, q < 0.01; odds ratio 2.57, p = 0.17). SI patients exhibited significantly lower baseline intestinal microbial diversity (Shannon diversity, 1.96 vs. 3.47, p < 0.01) and greater Enterococcus abundance (46% vs. 11%, q = 0.02), with similar patterns observed in the respiratory microbiome. Urinary NMR analysis identified metabolites mapping to features at 0.935 ppm (2-oxoisocaproate, isoleucine) in the core dataset, and at 8.025 ppm (quinolinate) in the UHC subset as elevated in SI patients. Multi-omics models demonstrated modest but consistent improvement over clinical-only models (AUC: 0.75 vs. 0.64).
conclusionsSI susceptibility in critically ill patients associates with underlying clinical severity, prior antibiotic exposure, and microbiota disruption. Multi-omics integration yielded consistent predictive improvement, supporting prospective validation as a proof-of-concept approach for early SI risk stratification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.