ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2026
Burning Issues/Hot Topics: The Charcot Foot.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Charcot neuro-osteoarthropathy remains one of the most serious complications of diabetic neuropathy, with the potential for rapid progression to deformity, ulceration and limb-threatening outcomes. The earliest signs and symptoms are often subtle and easily missed, yet early recognition provides a narrow window of opportunity to prevent irreversible structural change. Contemporary diagnostic pathways are underpinned by close clinical observation and correlation of bedside findings with detailed imaging analysis, enabling earlier identification of active disease before collapse occurs. This article provides a comprehensive overview of the Charcot foot, integrating clinical presentation, differential diagnosis and current approaches to investigation and management. It also highlights the challenges of monitoring disease activity over time, including remission and relapse, and the importance of timely specialist referral and multidisciplinary management. By reinforcing structured assessment and targeted intervention, this review aims to support consistent, evidence-informed care for people affected by Charcot neuro-osteoarthropathy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.