ReviewCancers2026
Current Advances in Proton FLASH Radiotherapy in Abdominal Cancers.
Review in Cancers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Harnessing the sparing effect of FLASH-RT: From phenomenon observation, radiophysical determinants to molecular mechanisms and synergistic strategies.Materials today. Bio · 2026Review
- From local control to immune synergy: the evolving role of stereotactic body radiotherapy in the immunotherapy era of hepatocellular carcinoma.Hepatobiliary surgery and nutrition · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Proton FLASH radiotherapy represents a promising innovation in the treatment of abdominal cancers, offering the potential to expand the therapeutic window by delivering ultra-high dose rates (UHDR) that spare normal tissue while maintaining tumor control. This approach is particularly beneficial for gastrointestinal (GI) tumors, where radiation dose escalation is often limited by the radiosensitivity of nearby organs. This review explores recent preclinical, planning, and technical developments in proton FLASH for abdominal sites and outlines the challenges and future directions for clinical translation. We reviewed the available published literature on proton FLASH radiotherapy, with a focus on abdominal applications. Recent preclinical studies in abdominal models have shown encouraging, though inconsistent, evidence of reduced toxicity with proton FLASH. Parallel advances in treatment planning have also demonstrated technical feasibility in achieving UHDR across complex abdominal geometries. However, key challenges remain, including variability in biological responses, lack of standardized dose-rate definitions, delivery system constraints, and the absence of robust clinical data. Although only limited clinical trials are currently underway, proton FLASH may enable safer hypofractionation, reirradiation, and dose escalation strategies in the future. Its successful clinical translation will require coordinated advances in biology, physics, and technology, supported by rigorous preclinical validation and carefully designed clinical trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.