ReviewCancers2026
JAK Inhibitors in the Treatment of T-Cell Lymphomas: Current Evidence and Future Directions.
Review in Cancers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Real-world efficacy and safety of golidocitinib in 3 patients with relapsed/refractory peripheral T-cell lymphoma.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- ALK-negative anaplastic large cell lymphoma in pediatric and adolescent patients: a mini-review.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
T-cell lymphomas are a heterogeneous group of lymphoid neoplasms with a variable prognosis. They can be further divided into cutaneous T-cell lymphomas and peripheral T-cell lymphomas. Treatment options are relatively limited for patients with relapsed or refractory disease. Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors have emerged as promising new drugs for these lymphomas, as increasing evidence supports the JAK and signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) pathway as a potential target. The objective of this review is to summarize the current evidence supporting the use of JAK inhibitors in the treatment of T-cell lymphomas and highlight areas for future research. Although many JAK inhibitors have been developed for the treatment of autoimmune conditions, only a subset of these have been tested in T-cell lymphomas and reported in the literature. These include abrocitinib, cerdulatinib, golidocitinib, ruxolitinib, tofacitinib, and upadacitinib. Other drugs are currently being tested in clinicals trials, including pacritinib and ivarmacitinib, but results are not yet available. Most of the published data are for ruxolitinib, which was found to have a clinical benefit rate of up to 53% in patients with PTCL with activating JAK and/or STAT mutations. Response durations are limited, which may be overcome through combination therapies in the future. JAK inhibitors are associated with multiple adverse effects, including cytopenias and infections, and long-term safety data are lacking for newer agents. Future studies will need to clarify long-term safety and efficacy through well-designed clinical trials involving larger groups of patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.