ReviewCancers2026
Challenges and Advances in the Detection of Leukemic Blasts in Cerebrospinal Fluid in Pediatric Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia.
Review in Cancers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Breaching the Blood-Brain Barrier: Evolving Strategies for Central Nervous System Disease in Adult Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia.Current hematologic malignancy reports · 2026Review
- Next-Generation Sequencing for Minimal Residual Disease Detection in Pediatric Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: Technological Advances, Clinical Translations and Current Challenges.Current issues in molecular biology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Central nervous system (CNS) evaluation for leukemic involvement is essential both at initial diagnosis and throughout relapse surveillance in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Accurate CNS risk classification is a cornerstone of individualized chemotherapy and has significantly advanced treatment strategies. However, detecting leukemic cells in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) is challenging, particularly when only a small number of cells are present. While cytomorphology remains a standard diagnostic method, it is limited by low sensitivity and interobserver variability, especially in low-cellularity or equivocal samples. Flow cytometry offers superior sensitivity and specificity and is increasingly recommended to confirm or clarify ambiguous findings. Current guidelines support the use of both cytomorphologic review and flow cytometry to maximize diagnostic accuracy. Evidence consistently demonstrates that any detectable CSF blasts-even in the setting of low WBC counts-are associated with increased risk of CNS relapse and poorer outcomes, underscoring the importance of risk-adapted CNS-directed therapy. Although the prognostic significance of isolated flow-only positivity remains under study, emerging data suggest that timely therapeutic intensification may mitigate adverse outcomes. Additional modalities, including advanced flow cytometry and molecular assays, may further refine CSF assessment in the future. This review summarizes current diagnostic approaches and highlights the need for standardized protocols for CSF evaluation in pediatric ALL.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.