ReviewCancers2026
Chemotherapy-Induced Alopecia in Breast Cancer Patients: Treatment-Specific Incidence and Risk of Persistent Hair Loss.
Review in Cancers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Isolation and Characterization of Glycosylated Fatty Acid Amides from the Norwegian Deep-Sea SpongeMarine drugs · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chemotherapy-induced alopecia (CIA) is one of the most common and visible toxicities of breast cancer treatment, yet its true incidence, severity, and long-term outcomes remain inconsistently reported. Although CIA is frequently cited as affecting approximately 65% of patients and persistent alopecia has historically been considered uncommon (1-15%), emerging data suggest a substantially greater burden. We conducted a scoping review of PubMed, EMBASE, SCOPUS, and Cochrane databases to synthesize regimen-specific evidence on the incidence, severity, and persistence of CIA in breast cancer patients. Anthracycline- and taxane-based regimens were associated with the highest risk, with severe alopecia reported in more than 70% of patients and rates approaching 90-100% in combination regimens. Cyclophosphamide further amplified acute CIA when combined with doxorubicin, with reported incidence up to 93%. In contrast, capecitabine and vinorelbine were consistently associated with lower alopecia incidence. Importantly, CIA was not uniformly reversible. Persistent CIA (pCIA) occurred in up to 67% of patients treated with doxorubicin-based regimens and nearly 50% of those receiving docetaxel combinations, substantially higher than historically reported. Despite its high frequency and potential permanence, CIA remains underreported in oncology trials and insufficiently addressed in survivorship care. Recognizing CIA as both an acute toxicity and a potential long-term survivorship concern underscores the need for standardized reporting, longitudinal follow-up, and development of effective preventive strategies in breast cancer care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.