ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2026
Myocardial Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury-Mechanistic Insights and Novel Therapeutics.
Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Quercetin-associated cardioprotection in preclinical myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Pooled it
- Skimmianine Pretreatment Attenuates Cerebellar Neuroinflammation and Myelin Injury Following Experimental Cerebral Ischemia-Reperfusion.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Article
- The immune-cardiovascular metabolic circuitry in myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury: from metabolic signal release to spatiotemporal reprogramming.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Controlled Delivery of Gasotransmitters for Cardiovascular Therapy: Molecular Mechanisms, Engineered Platforms, and Translational Perspectives.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
- Protein lactylation in myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury: mechanisms and therapeutic potential.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Myocardial ischemia-reperfusion (I/R) injury remains a major contributor to infarct expansion and adverse cardiac remodeling despite advances in timely reperfusion therapy. Although restoration of blood flow is essential for myocardial salvage, the abrupt transition from ischemia to reperfusion paradoxically exacerbates cardiomyocyte injury through profound metabolic, ionic, and mitochondrial disturbances. Reperfusion should be viewed not simply as restoration of blood flow, but as a critical biological transition that converts ischemic stress into a self-amplifying injury network. Reperfusion induces excessive reactive oxygen species generation, calcium overload, endothelial barrier disruption, and dysregulated innate immune activation, which converge on mitochondrial dysfunction and diverse forms of cell death, including apoptosis, necroptosis, pyroptosis, and ferroptosis. Emerging evidence highlights that these pathological processes are tightly interconnected through damage-associated molecular pattern signaling, microvascular leakage, and inflammatory amplification, underscoring the limitations of single-target therapeutic approaches. This review summarizes the molecular and cellular mechanisms underlying myocardial I/R injury with a particular focus on oxidative stress, immune modulation, vascular integrity, and ferroptosis. We further discuss current and emerging cardioprotective strategies, including antioxidant therapies, modulation of neutrophil recruitment, microvascular leakage blockade, and anti-ferroptotic interventions. Finally, we address key translational challenges and future perspectives for developing integrated cardioprotective therapies aimed at improving clinical outcomes in acute myocardial infarction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.