Evidence mapPaperPMID 41828429Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2026

Predictors of the Effectiveness of Psychedelics in Treating Depression-A Scoping Review.

James Chmiel, Filip Rybakowski

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

James ChmielFaculty of Physical Culture and Health, Institute of Physical Culture Sciences, University of Szczecin, Al. Piastów 40B blok 6, 71-065 Szczecin, Poland.ORCID 0009-0005-5320-3658
Filip RybakowskiDepartment and Clinic of Psychiatry, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, 61-701 Poznań, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-5503-3019

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Psychedelic-assisted therapies (PATs) can produce rapid and sustained antidepressant effects, yet variability in response remains substantial. Identifying predictors and moderators is essential for optimising patient selection, preparation, and delivery. To map and synthesise the evidence on the predictors of antidepressant response to classic/serotonergic psychedelics administered with psychotherapeutic support in adults with depressive disorders, including treatment-resistant depression. Following PRISMA-ScR principles, we conducted a scoping review of major biomedical and psychology databases (PubMed (MEDLINE), Embase, PsycINFO, and Web of Science) and trial registries (searches September-October 2025), supplemented by reference-list screening. We included randomised trials, open-label studies, and naturalistic cohorts reporting associations between candidate predictors (baseline traits/clinical features, set/setting variables, acute in-session phenomenology, and biological measures) and validated depression outcomes. We charted study characteristics, analytic approaches (including moderation/mediation where available), and indicators of robustness (e.g., adjustment for overall intensity, preregistration, external validation). A total of 48 studies were included in the review. Across study designs, process-level features during the dosing session were the most consistent correlates of antidepressant improvement. Greater emotional breakthrough, mystical/unitive experiences, and ego dissolution-linked reappraisal/insight generally predicted larger and more durable symptom reductions, whereas anxiety-dominant or dysphoric states tended to attenuate benefit, often independent of overall subjective intensity. Set and setting-particularly a stronger therapeutic alliance and music experienced as resonant-predicted both the emergence of therapeutically salient acute experiences and downstream clinical gains. Baseline moderators showed smaller and mixed effects: PTSD comorbidity sometimes weakened trajectories; extensive prior psychedelic exposure was associated with smaller incremental gains; demographics were typically uninformative. Converging biological findings associated better outcomes with markers consistent with increased neural flexibility and plasticity (e.g., less segregated network dynamics; EEG indices), alongside peripheral changes implicating neurotrophic, inflammatory, and HPA axis pathways. Current evidence suggests that antidepressant response in PATs is driven less by static patient characteristics and more by what occurs during dosing and how the context shapes that experience. Optimising preparation, alliance, and music; facilitating emotional breakthrough and meaning making; and mitigating anxious dysregulation are actionable levers. Future trials should harmonise measures, pre-specify and validate moderators/mediators, intensively sample in-session experience and physiology, and report benefits and harms more consistently.

Indexed as

Antidepressive AgentsDepressionHallucinogensHumansTreatment Effect HeterogeneityTreatment OutcomeAntidepressive AgentsHallucinogensdepressionneuroplasticitypredictorpsychedelics

Identifiers

PMID41828429
PMCPMC12984534

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.