Observational studySensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
First-in-Human Prospective, Observational, and Comparative Clinical Study of Simultaneous Invasive and Non-Invasive Intracranial Pressure Pulse Wave Monitoring.
Observational study in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Monitoring intracranial pressure (ICP) dynamics is critical for the management of traumatic brain injury, stroke, other neurosurgical conditions, and cerebral blood flow autoregulation; however, invasive ICP monitoring carries risks such as infection, hemorrhage, and sensor zero drift. Increasing evidence suggests that ICP waveform morphology provides clinically relevant information beyond mean ICP value alone. In this first-in-human prospective comparative clinical study, we evaluated the feasibility and accuracy of a novel, fully passive, non-invasive ICP pulse waveform monitoring system (Archimedes 02) based on the detection of eyeball mechanical movement. Fifteen intensive care unit patients (6 males, 9 females; mean age 57.1 ± 18.8 years) with clinically indicated invasive ICP monitoring or external ventricular drainage were enrolled. Three-minute monitoring sessions were performed to simultaneously acquire non-invasive ICP pulse waveforms, invasive ICP waveforms, and invasive radial artery blood pressure (ABP) waveforms. Averaged waveforms were derived for each patient and compared graphically and using correlation analysis. Non-invasive ICP pulse waves recorded with Archimedes 02 showed a strong correlation with invasive ICP waveforms (R¯ = 0.965). In contrast, correlations between non-invasive ICP and ABP waveforms (R¯ = 0.699), as well as between invasive ICP and ABP waveforms (R¯ = 0.749), were lower. These findings indicate that the non-invasive signal primarily reflects ICP dynamics rather than arterial blood pressure. This novel non-invasive ICP monitoring approach has the potential to enhance neurocritical care, particularly in settings where invasive monitoring is impractical or unavailable. Further validation in larger and more diverse patient populations is warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.