Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41829366›Full record

Observational studySensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026

First-in-Human Prospective, Observational, and Comparative Clinical Study of Simultaneous Invasive and Non-Invasive Intracranial Pressure Pulse Wave Monitoring.

Indre Lapinskiene, Edvinas Chaleckas, Vilma Putnynaite, Laimonas Bartusis, Yasin Hamarat, Aidanas Preiksaitis, Mindaugas Serpytis, Vytautas Petkus, Saulius Vosylius, Arminas Ragauskas

Abstract readObservational StudyComparative Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Indre LapinskieneClinic of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, LT-03101 Vilnius, Lithuania.
Edvinas ChaleckasHealth Telematics Science Institute, Kaunas University of Technology, LT-51423 Kaunas, Lithuania.
Vilma PutnynaiteHealth Telematics Science Institute, Kaunas University of Technology, LT-51423 Kaunas, Lithuania.ORCID 0009-0002-5471-5645
Laimonas BartusisHealth Telematics Science Institute, Kaunas University of Technology, LT-51423 Kaunas, Lithuania.
Yasin HamaratHealth Telematics Science Institute, Kaunas University of Technology, LT-51423 Kaunas, Lithuania.ORCID 0000-0002-1343-5068
Aidanas PreiksaitisClinic of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, LT-03101 Vilnius, Lithuania.
Mindaugas SerpytisClinic of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, LT-03101 Vilnius, Lithuania.ORCID 0000-0002-2836-3941
Vytautas PetkusHealth Telematics Science Institute, Kaunas University of Technology, LT-51423 Kaunas, Lithuania.ORCID 0000-0002-8964-0738
Saulius VosyliusClinic of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, LT-03101 Vilnius, Lithuania.ORCID 0000-0001-8548-9033
Arminas RagauskasHealth Telematics Science Institute, Kaunas University of Technology, LT-51423 Kaunas, Lithuania.

Funding

Lietuvos Mokslo Taryba S-ITP-24-11Lietuvos Mokslo Taryba S-MIP-23-68Lietuvos Mokslo Taryba S-PD-24-154
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Monitoring intracranial pressure (ICP) dynamics is critical for the management of traumatic brain injury, stroke, other neurosurgical conditions, and cerebral blood flow autoregulation; however, invasive ICP monitoring carries risks such as infection, hemorrhage, and sensor zero drift. Increasing evidence suggests that ICP waveform morphology provides clinically relevant information beyond mean ICP value alone. In this first-in-human prospective comparative clinical study, we evaluated the feasibility and accuracy of a novel, fully passive, non-invasive ICP pulse waveform monitoring system (Archimedes 02) based on the detection of eyeball mechanical movement. Fifteen intensive care unit patients (6 males, 9 females; mean age 57.1 ± 18.8 years) with clinically indicated invasive ICP monitoring or external ventricular drainage were enrolled. Three-minute monitoring sessions were performed to simultaneously acquire non-invasive ICP pulse waveforms, invasive ICP waveforms, and invasive radial artery blood pressure (ABP) waveforms. Averaged waveforms were derived for each patient and compared graphically and using correlation analysis. Non-invasive ICP pulse waves recorded with Archimedes 02 showed a strong correlation with invasive ICP waveforms (R¯ = 0.965). In contrast, correlations between non-invasive ICP and ABP waveforms (R¯ = 0.699), as well as between invasive ICP and ABP waveforms (R¯ = 0.749), were lower. These findings indicate that the non-invasive signal primarily reflects ICP dynamics rather than arterial blood pressure. This novel non-invasive ICP monitoring approach has the potential to enhance neurocritical care, particularly in settings where invasive monitoring is impractical or unavailable. Further validation in larger and more diverse patient populations is warranted.

Indexed as

Intracranial PressurePulse Wave AnalysisAdultAgedBlood PressureBrain Injuries, TraumaticFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMonitoring, PhysiologicProspective Studiesintracerebral hemorrhageintracranial complianceintracranial pressurenon-invasive monitoringsubarachnoid hemorrhagetraumatic brain injury

Identifiers

PMID41829366
PMCPMC12986807

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.