ArticleNutrients2026
Article in Nutrients, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectivesThis study investigated the systemic metabolic effects of two probiotic strains,
methodsObesity was induced in C57BL/6 mice via high-fat diet (HFD) feeding for 6 weeks. Subsequently, the mice were orally administered MG5012 or MG741 for 8 weeks. We assessed systemic metabolic parameters, including body weight, adiposity, and serum biomarkers. Additionally, histological and molecular analyses were performed to evaluate hepatic steatosis, intestinal barrier integrity, and muscle oxidative status.
resultsBoth strains significantly attenuated body weight gain and adiposity, reduced serum liver injury markers (γ-GTP, ALT, AST), and improved systemic metabolic parameters by restoring serum GLP-1 levels and reducing hyperinsulinemia. Crucially, MG5012 and MG741 strengthened intestinal barrier integrity by upregulating the tight junction proteins Occludin and Claudin-1. In the liver, histological analyses revealed reductions in hepatic steatosis and triglyceride content, accompanied by the downregulation of lipogenic genes (SREBP-1c, FAS). Furthermore, the probiotics preserved skeletal muscle integrity; while muscle weight remained unchanged, the strains increased muscle fiber cross-sectional area (CSA) and reduced serum markers of muscle damage (CPK, LDH). This protective effect was associated with significantly enhanced expression of antioxidant enzymes (SOD, CAT, GPx) in muscle tissue.
conclusionsThese findings suggest that MG5012 and MG741 confer systemic metabolic benefits through the modulation of the gut-liver-muscle axis and may serve as promising functional food ingredients for the management of MASLD and obesity-associated muscle atrophy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.