Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41830007›Full record

ReviewNutrients2026

Impact of Vitamin D Status on Pancreatic Cancer Risk and Outcomes.

Beata Jabłońska, Sławomir Mrowiec

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nutrients, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Beata JabłońskaDepartment of Digestive Tract Surgery, Medical University of Silesia, Medyków 14, 40-752 Katowice, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-5495-2969
Sławomir MrowiecDepartment of Digestive Tract Surgery, Medical University of Silesia, Medyków 14, 40-752 Katowice, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vitamin D (VD), a fat-soluble prohormone, exerts diverse effects on cellular proliferation, differentiation, and immune modulation, with accumulating evidence supporting its role in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) biology. Experimental studies demonstrate that VD and its analogs can inhibit PDAC cell growth and remodel the tumor microenvironment, potentially contributing to tumor suppression. Epidemiological data indicate that VD deficiency is prevalent among PDAC patients and is associated with increased inflammatory biomarkers and reduced overall survival, particularly in early-stage disease. However, meta-analyses reveal inconsistent associations between circulating 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels and PDAC incidence, while higher levels may be linked to improved survival but not reduced risk of disease onset. The clinical utility of VD supplementation for PDAC prevention or treatment remains uncertain, with ongoing debate regarding optimal dosing, timing, and patient selection. This narrative review synthesizes current evidence on the mechanistic, epidemiological, and clinical relevance of VD in PDAC. Particular emphasis is placed on existing knowledge gaps and the need for well-designed clinical trials to clarify the potential therapeutic and prognostic role of VD in pancreatic cancer.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Pancreatic DuctalPancreatic NeoplasmsVitamin DVitamin D DeficiencyAnimalsDietary SupplementsHumansRisk FactorsTumor Microenvironment25-hydroxyvitamin DVitamin Dcalcitriolpancreatic cancerpancreatic ductal adenocarcinomatumor microenvironmentvitamin D

Identifiers

PMID41830007
PMCPMC12987229

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.