ArticleTropical animal health and production2026
Impact of short feed restriction to compensatory growth on the performance, body measurements, and carcass and non-carcass traits of Bunaji and Sokoto Gudali Nigerian bulls.
Article in Tropical animal health and production, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study investigated compensatory growth (CG) responses in Sokoto Gudali (SG) and Bunaji (BN) bulls. Forty animals (20 SG and 20 BN) were randomly assigned to two feeding levels (high-energy vs. restricted) in a 2 × 2 factorial design, with initial mean weights of 255 ± 30.0 kg (SG) and 249 ± 48.6 kg (BN). During a 30-day feed restriction phase, one group (10 SG and 10 BN) received a high-energy diet with concentrate at 2% of body weight (BW), while the second group (10 SG and 10 BN) received 1% BW. All bulls were subsequently refed a high-energy diet (2% BW) for 120 days. During restriction, bulls fed 1% BW showed reduced dry matter intake (DMI), poorer feed conversion, and decreased muscle and fat depth in the longissimus thoracis compared with those fed 2% BW (P < 0.05). During refeeding, DMI did not differ between treatments (P > 0.05). However, previously restricted bulls exhibited a higher average daily gain (ADG; P < 0.05), indicating compensatory growth. Across the entire period, bulls fed 2% BW had higher DMI but better total FCR. At the end of the refeeding period, no differences (P > 0.05) between supplementation level groups (1 and 2% BW) were observed for linear body measurements, carcass conformation, and fat classification. Sokoto Gudali cattle had greater subcutaneous fat, rib fat, hide weight, and larger linear carcass dimensions but lower dressing percentage and carcass conformation scores compared to BN cattle (P < 0.05). Bulls on the 1% BW diet achieved a mean CG index of 0.45, with no difference between breeds. Significantly, the longissimus thoracis et lumborum muscle fully recovered following refeeding. Both Bunaji and Sokoto Gudali bulls displayed clear compensatory growth after moderate nutritional restriction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.