ArticleNeuroradiology2026
Super-resolution deep learning reconstruction enhances visualization of cerebral aneurysms on magnetic resonance angiography.
Article in Neuroradiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo evaluate the depiction of cerebral aneurysms on magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) reconstructed using super-resolution deep learning reconstruction (SR-DLR).
methodsWe retrospectively reviewed the MRA images of 79 patients (49 with cerebral aneurysms and 30 without). The MRA images were subjected to SR-DLR and compared with the original images using both quantitative (signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) for the basilar artery (BA) and aneurysms; full width at half maximum (FWHM), edge rise distance (ERD), and edge rise slope (ERS) for the BA) and qualitative metrics (depiction of aneurysms and BA, image sharpness, noise, artifacts, and overall image quality performed by three radiologists). Statistical comparisons were performed using a paired t-test for quantitative metrics and the Wilcoxon signed-rank test for qualitative metrics.
resultsSR-DLR significantly improved SNR, CNR, and ERD compared with the original images. ERS values showed a trend toward improvement with SR-DLR, whereas FWHM showed no significant difference. Depiction of the vasculature, image sharpness, noise, and overall image quality were rated as significantly better for SR-DLR by all readers. Most readers rated that the depiction of aneurysms was improved with SR-DLR, particularly for aneurysms < 5 mm. The assessment of artifacts varied among readers.
conclusionSR-DLR significantly improves the image quality of MRA and enhances the visualization of cerebral aneurysms, with greater improvements in the depiction of smaller aneurysms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.