ReviewInternational urology and nephrology2026
How to perform a renal transplant biopsy: a practical guide for clinicians with CEUS-driven diagnosis and follow-up of complications.
Review in International urology and nephrology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Percutaneous ultrasound-guided kidney biopsy remains the reference standard for diagnosing renal allograft dysfunction and for tailoring immunosuppression. Although major complications are uncommon in experienced hands, bleeding-related events and post-biopsy vascular lesions require a rapid, operational imaging and follow-up strategy. This practical guide provides a step-by-step, competency-based workflow for renal transplant biopsy-from indication setting and risk optimisation to room set-up, equipment selection, safe cortical targeting, and specimen adequacy criteria-followed by structured post-biopsy monitoring and discharge counselling. In this study, we will be conducting a comparative analysis of percutaneous, transvenous, and CT-guided approaches. Furthermore, we will be summarising pragmatic thresholds for blood pressure, coagulation parameters, and periprocedural antithrombotic management. A dedicated section integrates contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) into complication triage when grayscale ultrasound and Doppler are equivocal, defining practical triggers for escalation and follow-up pathways for haematoma, pseudoaneurysm, arteriovenous fistula, and segmental perfusion defects. The translation of imaging findings into actionable clinical decisions, facilitated by a protocolised biopsy technique in conjunction with CEUS-driven problem solving, has been demonstrated to enhance diagnostic confidence and improve safety in routine transplant care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41831140What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.