ReviewDrugs2026
Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatohepatitis (MASH)-Cirrhosis Clinical Trials: Lessons Learned and Future Directions.
Review in Drugs, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH)-cirrhosis represents a critical and growing global health burden due to its progression to hepatic decompensation, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and liver-related mortality. A growing number of MASH-related HCCs contribute to the increasing need for liver transplantation. Under current regulatory guidance, Phase 3 trials in compensated MASH cirrhosis compare drug versus placebo on time to a composite endpoint for outcomes. Composite endpoints are major adverse liver outcomes (MALO)-hepatic decompensation (ascites requiring treatment, variceal hemorrhage, hepatic encephalopathy, MELD ≥ 15), liver transplantation-and all‑cause mortality. Future trial sample size hinges on the annual event rate and expected effect size. From prior studies, event rates are ~ 3-20% higher with risk features. Progression to large gastroesophageal varices is now an accepted endpoint and will typically add a 3-5% yearly event rate to the baseline MALO event rate. Effect sizes on hard outcomes in metabolic chronic diseases often range from 0.70-0.85. Trials should enroll high‑risk patients (defined as those with clinically significant portal hypertension [CSPH], Child Turcotte Pugh A cirrhosis, and magnetic resonance elastography measurements > 6.5 kPa), plan 3-5 years of follow‑up and enroll using noninvasive criteria. Accelerated approval based on histologic reversal of cirrhosis is potentially possible; the SYMMETRY Phase 2b trial achieved F4 regression within 96 weeks with efruxifermin. Levers to increase regression include an upper limit for liver stiffness measurement(LSM), a platelet threshold (> 110,000/µL), limiting CSPH, and prespecified proportions with FIB‑4 > 3.5 or enhanced liver fibrosis (ELF) > 11.3. Ongoing studies include but are not limited to survodutide, a glucagon/GLP-1 receptor dual agonist targeting metabolic drivers, efruxifermin, an FGF21 analog, and a conditionally approved drug resmetirom, which is a selective thyroid hormone receptor β agonist.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41831171What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.