Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41832194›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Capecitabine combined with fecal microbiota transplantation prevents colorectal cancer progression through correction of microbial dysbiosis and immune regulation.

Muhammad Arshad, Chong-Yuan Zhang, Zhan-Kui Gao, Hui Sun, Dan-Qi Xu, Chao-Yuan Fan, Bo-Wen Zhang, Jia-Xin Geng, Yang Li, Aleksandr Kotusov and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Muhammad Arshad *Genomics Research Center (Key Laboratory of Gut Microbiota and Pharmacogenomics of Heilongjiang Province), College of Pharmacy, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China.
Chong-Yuan Zhang *Jiangzhong Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. , Nanchang, China.
Zhan-Kui GaoGenomics Research Center (Key Laboratory of Gut Microbiota and Pharmacogenomics of Heilongjiang Province), College of Pharmacy, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China.
Hui SunCollege of Pharmacy, Heilongjiang University of Chinese Medicine, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China.
Dan-Qi XuGenomics Research Center (Key Laboratory of Gut Microbiota and Pharmacogenomics of Heilongjiang Province), College of Pharmacy, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China.
Chao-Yuan FanGenomics Research Center (Key Laboratory of Gut Microbiota and Pharmacogenomics of Heilongjiang Province), College of Pharmacy, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China.
Bo-Wen ZhangGenomics Research Center (Key Laboratory of Gut Microbiota and Pharmacogenomics of Heilongjiang Province), College of Pharmacy, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China.
Jia-Xin GengGenomics Research Center (Key Laboratory of Gut Microbiota and Pharmacogenomics of Heilongjiang Province), College of Pharmacy, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China.
Yang LiJinzhou Maternal and Child Health Hospital (Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital), Jinzhou, Liaoning, China.
Aleksandr KotusovInstitute of Clinical Medicine, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russian Federation.
Shu-Lin LiuGenomics Research Center (Key Laboratory of Gut Microbiota and Pharmacogenomics of Heilongjiang Province), College of Pharmacy, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China. slliu@hrbmu.edu.cn.
Ning ZhangCollege of Pharmacy, Heilongjiang University of Chinese Medicine, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China. zhangning0454@163.com.
Xiao-Qin MuGenomics Research Center (Key Laboratory of Gut Microbiota and Pharmacogenomics of Heilongjiang Province), College of Pharmacy, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China. muxiaoqin@ems.hrbmu.edu.cn.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China NSFC81903631National Natural Science Foundation of China NSFC82020108022, NSFCU23A20521Youth Innovation Fund of University in Hei Longjiang UNPYSCT14 2018065
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The significant economic burden of colorectal cancer (CRC) necessitates the development of innovative therapeutic approaches. Interest in the gut microbiota’s role in CRC has increased. Capecitabine, as a chemotherapy, may disrupt the balance of the intestinal microbiota. This study investigated the anticancer effects of capecitabine combined with fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) in a CRC mouse model caused by azoxymethane and dextran sodium sulfate. FMT was achieved with fecal microbiota from healthy mice through enema. Capecitabine decreased the number and diameter of cancer foci in CRC mice, while FMT supplementation had a more noticeable impact, indicated by increased body weight and survival rate. Capecitabine significantly reduced the abundance of pathogenic bacteria in mice with CRC, such as Bacteroides, Enterorhabdus, Monoglobus, Rodentibacter, uncultured_rumen_bacterium, Turicibacter, and Streptococcus. The supplementation of FMT more effectively reversed the gut microbiota dysbiosis in CRC mice, as demonstrated by the ACE and Chao 1 indices, PCoA analysis, and enhanced normal biological pathways. Microbial dysbiosis induced immunological dysfunction in CRC mice, indicated by abnormal immune cell recruitment and excessive cytokine production. Capecitabine treatment reduced immune cell infiltration, including CD3+ T cells, CD4+ T cells, and CD49b+ NK cells, as chemotherapy often suppresses the immune system. The supplement of FMT increased the proportion of CD4+ T cells, CD49b+ NK cells, CD8+ T cells, and LY6G+ neutrophils, indicating improved immune responses against CRC. Moreover, capecitabine therapy alone reduced the overexpression of IL1a, IL6, IL12a, IL12b, IL17, IL22, FOXP3, STAT3, IFN-γ, TNF-α, TGF-β, GZMA, CXCR4, OPN, PD-1 and PD-L1. FMT supplementation resulted in a higher immune response to CRC, as it had a greater inhibitory effect on the overexpression of inflammatory cytokines and enhanced the production of IL10, IFN-γ, and CXCR4. These cytokines were positively correlated with Azospirillum_sp._47_25, Romboutsia, Lactococcus, Rikenella_sp._Marseille_P3215 and Turicibacter and negatively correlated with Parabacteroids, unclassified_Oscillospiraceae, Marvinbryantia, unclassified_Clostridia_vadinBB60_group, unclassified_Erysipelatoclostridiaceae, A2, Roseburia, Rikenellaceae_RC9_gut_group, Acetatifactor and unclassified_Clostridia. The combination of capecitabine and FMT is more effective at preventing CRC than capecitabine alone, as it reverses gut microbial abnormalities and boosts immune responses to CRC.

Indexed as

CapecitabineColorectal NeoplasmsDysbiosisFecal Microbiota TransplantationGastrointestinal MicrobiomeAnimalsCytokinesDextran SulfateDisease Models, AnimalDisease ProgressionMaleMiceCapecitabineCytokinesDextran SulfateCapecitabineColorectal cancerCytokinesDysbiosisFecal microbiota transplantationImmune cells

Identifiers

PMID41832194
PMCPMC13121660

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.