ArticleBMC infectious diseases2026
Glucose control and mortality from lower respiratory tract infections in patients with diabetes: evidence from real-world data.
Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDiabetes mellitus increases both susceptibility to and severity of lower respiratory tract infections (LRTIs). However, the quantitative relationship between the range of glucose control and mortality from LRTIs in patients with diabetes has not been well defined. This study evaluated the association between fasting blood glucose (FBG) at the health check-up closest to the LRTI diagnosis and subsequent LRTI mortality in patients with diabetes, using data from the Korean National Health Insurance Service–National Sample Cohort (NHIS-NSC).
methodsThis study included 4,514 adults with diabetes diagnosed with pneumonia (J12–J18) or influenza (J09–J11) in the cohort between 2002 and 2019. Mortality after LRTI diagnosis was identified using claims and cause-of-death records. FBG from the health check-up closest to the LRTI diagnosis was classified into three categories (< 80, 80–130, ≥ 130 mg/dL) based on Korean Diabetes Association recommendations. Logistic regression was performed to estimate the association between FBG categories and mortality after adjustment for age, sex, smoking status, physical activity, body mass index, hypertension, income, cardiovascular disease, and duration of diabetes. Dose–response relationships in group3(FBG ≥ 130 mg/dl) were evaluated using linear and restricted cubic spline models.
resultsAmong the study population, 212 patients (4.7%) died from LRTIs. Compared with those with target-range FBG (80–130 mg/dL), patients with FBG ≥ 130 mg/dL had a significantly higher risk of mortality (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.54; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.11–2.14). This association remained robust after excluding outliers (FBG > 383 mg/dL) and in extended adjustment models. A clear dose–response relationship was observed between FBG and mortality risk. Relative to target-range FBG, mortality risk increased 1.4-fold at 160–189 mg/dL and rose sharply to 2.5-fold at ≥ 190 mg/dL.
conclusionsReal-world data showed that elevated FBG in patients with diabetes increased the risk of mortality from LRTI. This study not only demonstrates, using real-world data, the importance of adequate glycemic control in patients with diabetes, but also identifies a threshold at which mortality risk rises sharply. These findings emphasize that appropriate glycemic control may reduce infection-related mortality and should be considered a critical component of public health strategies for diabetic populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.