Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41832549›Full record

ArticleHealth and quality of life outcomes2026

Anticipating incomplete patient-reported outcomes in schizophrenia: a machine learning approach to predict the occurrence of missing data.

Guillaume Barbalat, Julien Plasse, Isabelle Chéreau-Boudet, Benjamin Gouache, Emilie Legros-Lafarge, Nathalie Guillard-Bouhet, Nicolas Franck

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health and quality of life outcomes, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Guillaume BarbalatCentre Ressource de Réhabilitation Psychosociale et de Remédiation Cognitive (CRR), Hôpital Le Vinatier, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS UMR 5229, et Université Lyon 1, Lyon, France. Guillaume.Barbalat@ch-le-vinatier.fr.
Julien PlasseCentre Ressource de Réhabilitation Psychosociale et de Remédiation Cognitive (CRR), Hôpital Le Vinatier, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS UMR 5229, et Université Lyon 1, Lyon, France.
Isabelle Chéreau-BoudetCentre Référent Conjoint de Réhabilitation (CRCR), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Benjamin GouacheCentre Référent de Réhabilitation Psychosociale et de Remédiation Cognitive (C3R), Centre Hospitalier Alpes Isère, Grenoble, France.
Emilie Legros-LafargeCentre Référent de Réhabilitation Psychosociale de Limoges (C2RL), Limoges, France.
Nathalie Guillard-BouhetUnité de Recherche Clinique Pierre Deniker, Centre Hospitalier Henri Laborit, CHU et faculté de médecine de Poitiers, Poitiers, France.
Nicolas FranckCentre Ressource de Réhabilitation Psychosociale et de Remédiation Cognitive (CRR), Hôpital Le Vinatier, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS UMR 5229, et Université Lyon 1, Lyon, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMissing data in patient-reported outcome (PRO) databases is a pervasive challenge, particularly in psychiatry and psychosocial rehabilitation. Incomplete data may reduce the generalizability of findings and introduce selection bias. It may also signal loss of access to care, potentially hindering recovery and rehabilitation efforts. Proactively anticipating missingness can help mitigate this issue by identifying individuals at risk of missing values, enabling services to take timely and targeted actions in response. However, the predictability of incomplete PRO data remains underexplored.

methodsWe used data from the French multicentric psychosocial rehabilitation database REHABase, focusing our analysis on patients with schizophrenia. We developed an ensemble machine learning model to predict missing data occurrence across six PROs, incorporating treatment center affiliation, sociodemographic features and clinical predictors. To ensure interpretability, we applied the concept of Shapley values to quantify individual predictor contributions to missing data patterns.

resultsOur sample comprised N = 2,363 participants. Averaged areas under the receiving operating curve (AUC) measured on the holdout testing observations ranged from 0.73 to 0.78 across the six PRO scales, demonstrating good predictive performance of our ensemble model. Treatment center affiliation emerged as a critical predictor of missing data. The ten most influential patient-level predictors were: being a disabled worker beneficiary; educational attainment; housing status; duration of illness; antipsychotic medication; origin of the referrer; number of suicide attempts; addictions comorbidity; having a forensic history; and sex. We also identified directional contributions distinguishing positive (increased likelihood of missing values) and negative effects (decreased likelihood).

conclusionsTo our knowledge, this work represents the first predictive analytics framework for the occurrence of missing PRO data in psychosocial rehabilitation. Our ensemble algorithm holds dual potential: improving data collection strategies and informing targeted interventions to enhance patient engagement and retention. By proactively identifying at-risk individuals and refining study designs, our model could also indirectly support better functional recovery outcomes for schizophrenia patients.

Indexed as

Machine LearningPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresSchizophreniaAdultDatabases, FactualFemaleFranceHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrediction AlgorithmsPredictive Learning ModelsEnsemble algorithmMachine learningMissing dataPatient-reported outcomes (PROs)Psychosocial rehabilitationREHABaseSchizophreniaSHAP values

Identifiers

PMID41832549
PMCPMC13104463

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.