Observational studyClinical drug investigation2026
Effectiveness and Tolerability of Vortioxetine in Major Depressive Disorder: A Real-World Study in Switzerland.
Observational study in Clinical drug investigation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectivesVortioxetine is widely used in Switzerland for treating major depressive episodes, but systematically collected data from routine clinical practice are not available. We evaluated real-world effectiveness and tolerability of vortioxetine for treating major depressive episodes in Swiss clinical practice.
methodsA prospective non-interventional observational study was conducted with an observation period of approximately 8 weeks from vortioxetine initiation. Adults with a current major depressive episode for whom a decision to initiate vortioxetine had been made independent of the study were eligible for inclusion. Assessment of depressive symptoms, functioning, safety and tolerability were performed at four study visits. Pre-planned explorative descriptive statistics were applied.
resultsOf 226 patients enrolled, 208 (92.0%) completed the study. At baseline, the mean (standard deviation) sum of the unanchored Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale items was 34.3 (8.89), indicating severe depression. Depression severity tended to be underestimated when relying on clinical estimation without any scale alone. Significant reductions were observed from baseline to visit 4 in the sum of the unanchored Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale items, in all individual items, and in the Clinical Global Impression-Severity scale (all p < 0.001). The severity of impairment of all assessed functioning domains also decreased. Adverse drug reactions were reported in 7.5% of patients. Effectiveness and tolerability of vortioxetine was rated good or very good by >88% of clinicians and patients.
conclusionsPatients who initiated vortioxetine for treating a major depressive episode experienced improvements in depressive symptoms and functioning. Vortioxetine was well tolerated. Underestimation of depressive episode severity by clinicians reinforces the importance of using rating scales in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.