ReviewAlzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association2026
Measuring blood-brain barrier dysfunction: a critical appraisal of fluid biomarkers, in vitro models, in vivo imaging, and post-mortem approaches.
Review in Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Disentangling MRI-derived blood-brain barrier leakage into vascular permeability and surface area.Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The blood-brain barrier (BBB) maintains central nervous system homeostasis by regulating molecular exchange between blood and brain. BBB dysfunction is associated with aging and neurological disorders such as Alzheimer's disease, stroke, and multiple sclerosis. Diverse approaches are used to study BBB structure and function, including cell-based models, imaging techniques, and fluid biomarkers. While each method has distinct strengths, inherent limitations complicate interpretation and limit comparability across studies. In addition, many methods require specialized expertise, hindering the interdisciplinary integration of findings. This review outlines commonly used methods to assess BBB dysfunction and critically evaluates their relevance, advantages, and drawbacks. It provides guidance for selecting suitable techniques, proposes guidelines, and highlights key challenges in data interpretation. Finally, the review emphasizes the need to clearly define the specific BBB aspect under investigation, calls for standardized protocols, and encourages combining approaches to improve research quality and translation into clinically meaningful insights and applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.