Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41833526›Full record

ReviewAlzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association2026

Measuring blood-brain barrier dysfunction: a critical appraisal of fluid biomarkers, in vitro models, in vivo imaging, and post-mortem approaches.

Shakira A van der Panne, Helena Durrant, Jannis F Heuer, Ivana Kancheva, Arno Stellingwerf, Lieuwe T K M Verkaar, Damon Verstappen, Pascalle Mossel, Walter H Backes, Erik N T P Bakker and 5 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Disentangling MRI-derived blood-brain barrier leakage into vascular permeability and surface area.Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Shakira A van der PanneDepartment of Biomedical Engineering and Physics, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, Location AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0009-0002-6040-8481
Helena DurrantC.J. Gorter MRI Center, Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0009-0000-3071-4432
Jannis F HeuerAmsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Ivana KanchevaC.J. Gorter MRI Center, Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-1151-6243
Arno StellingwerfDepartment of Neurology, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0009-0007-0030-285X
Lieuwe T K M VerkaarDepartment of Geriatric Medicine, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Damon VerstappenDepartment of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-2329-5203
Pascalle MosselDepartment of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Walter H BackesDepartment of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-7905-0681
Erik N T P BakkerDepartment of Biomedical Engineering and Physics, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, Location AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-2819-5818
Jurgen A H R ClaassenDepartment of Geriatric Medicine, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-1778-8151
Marcel M VerbeekDepartment of Neurology, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-4635-7876
Louise van der WeerdC.J. Gorter MRI Center, Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-5997-2125
Matthias J P van OschC.J. Gorter MRI Center, Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-7034-8959
Helga E de VriesAmsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-7904-7124

Funding

Alzheimer Nederland WE.30-2022-04MODEM, Dementia Research Program of ZonMw 10510032120006
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The blood-brain barrier (BBB) maintains central nervous system homeostasis by regulating molecular exchange between blood and brain. BBB dysfunction is associated with aging and neurological disorders such as Alzheimer's disease, stroke, and multiple sclerosis. Diverse approaches are used to study BBB structure and function, including cell-based models, imaging techniques, and fluid biomarkers. While each method has distinct strengths, inherent limitations complicate interpretation and limit comparability across studies. In addition, many methods require specialized expertise, hindering the interdisciplinary integration of findings. This review outlines commonly used methods to assess BBB dysfunction and critically evaluates their relevance, advantages, and drawbacks. It provides guidance for selecting suitable techniques, proposes guidelines, and highlights key challenges in data interpretation. Finally, the review emphasizes the need to clearly define the specific BBB aspect under investigation, calls for standardized protocols, and encourages combining approaches to improve research quality and translation into clinically meaningful insights and applications.

Indexed as

BiomarkersBlood-Brain BarrierAnimalsBrainHumansBiomarkersBBB dysfunctionblood–brain barrierbrain endotheliumcritical appraisalimagingmethodsreview

Identifiers

PMID41833526
PMCPMC13093804

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.