Evidence mapPaperPMID 41834015Full record

Trial reportScientific reports2026

Information and communications technology-based versus handout-based home exercise programs for heel pain syndrome: a prospective randomized study.

Dong Woo Shim, Kwang Hwan ParK, Jin Woo Lee, Hak Jun Kim, Dong Hun Suh, Yeong Jeon, Ji Hun Park, Gi Won Choi

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Dong Woo Shim *Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Kwang Hwan ParK *Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Jin Woo LeeDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Hak Jun KimDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Korea University Guro Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Dong Hun SuhDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery , Korea University Ansan Hospital , Ansan-si, Republic of Korea.
Yeong JeonDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery , Korea University Ansan Hospital , Ansan-si, Republic of Korea.
Ji Hun ParkDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery , Korea University Ansan Hospital , Ansan-si, Republic of Korea.
Gi Won ChoiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery , Korea University Ansan Hospital , Ansan-si, Republic of Korea. barefoot@korea.ac.kr.

Funding

National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea government (MSIT) RS-2020-NR050639
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To compare the clinical outcomes of information and communications technology (ICT)-based home exercise programs using the exercise therapy platform (ETP™) with traditional handout-based programs for treating heel pain syndrome. Eighty-seven patients with heel pain syndrome (plantar fasciitis or Achilles tendinitis) were randomly assigned to either an ICT-based ETP™ (n = 44) or a traditional handout-based (n = 43) home exercise program. Both groups performed the same exercises for 12 weeks. Outcomes were assessed at baseline and at 4, 12, and 24 weeks using a visual analog scale (VAS) for first-step pain (primary outcome), pain at rest and during activity, foot function index (FFI), Short Form-36 (SF-36) score, and self-reported recovery. In the ETP™ group, mean improvement in VAS score for first-step pain exceeded the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) of 1.9 at all follow-up points, whereas the handout group did not achieve MCID at 4 weeks (1.4 ± 1.9). However, the mixed-effects model did not demonstrate a statistically significant between-group difference for first-step pain. For FFI, the ETP™ group showed greater improvement than the handout group at 4 weeks (between-group difference in change − 16.66, 95% confidence interval [CI] − 32.34 to − 0.99; p = 0.037; Hedges g = − 0.47) and 24 weeks (− 16.37, 95% CI − 32.04 to − 0.69; p = 0.041; g = − 0.39). For SF-36 PCS, improvement was significantly greater in the ETP™ group at 24 weeks than in the handout group (8.90, 95% CI 2.41 to 15.40; p = 0.007; g = 0.47). Self-reported recovery rates were higher in the ETP™ group at 12 and 24 weeks. In this study, both interventions improved symptoms of heel pain syndrome. Although the ETP™ group demonstrated clinically meaningful reductions in first-step pain and greater improvements in some secondary outcomes, no statistically significant between-group difference was observed for the primary outcome. These findings suggest potential benefits of ICT-based exercise therapy platforms, and further studies are needed to confirm their comparative effectiveness. Trial registration Retrospectively registered with the Clinical Research Information Services (identifier KCT0010211, registration date: 19/02/2025).

Indexed as

Exercise TherapyFasciitis, PlantarHeelPain ManagementAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPain MeasurementProspective StudiesTreatment OutcomeAchilles tendinitisHeel pain syndromeHome exerciseICTPlantar fasciitisSmartphone app

Identifiers

PMID41834015
PMCPMC13121438

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.