ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2026
Recommendations to Improve Healthcare Service Provision for Cognitive Impairment in People With Parkinson's Disease: A Mixed Methods Study of the Lived Experience Expert Perspective.
Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Best practice guidelines for the diagnosis, evaluation, and management of cognitive disorders in Parkinson's disease.Age and ageing · 2026Guideline
- Barriers and enablers to cognitive assessment in Parkinson's disease: A qualitative contextual inquiry.Journal of Parkinson's disease · 2026Article
- What can we do to enhance cognitive care in Parkinson's disease?Alzheimer's & dementia (Amsterdam, Netherlands)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCognitive impairment, including dementia, is one of the most important nonmotor symptoms of Parkinson's disease (PD). It lowers quality of life and impacts health and economic outcomes for individuals living with PD, their families, and society. Poor recognition and management of cognitive impairment and dementia in PD highlights the need for improved diagnostic and postdiagnostic care pathways. We aimed to inquire about current health services for cognitive evaluation in Australia from people with lived experience of PD. The objective was to derive recommendations for best practice guidelines.
methodsThis two-stage exploratory sequential mixed-method study utilised qualitative and quantitative methods. Stage 1 conducted seven online focus groups exploring the experiences of neuropsychological assessment, diagnosis, and post-diagnostic support for cognitive impairment and dementia in PD. Transcripts were analysed using deductive and inductive thematic analysis and recommendations were derived from this data. Stage 2 involved a national survey of these recommendations to ascertain agreement using a 5-point Likert scale. Recommendations meeting ≥ 70% agreement, median rating ≥ 4, and inter quartile rating (IQR) ≤ 1 were deemed acceptable for inclusion in the guidelines.
resultsFocus groups included people with PD (PwPD) with subjective cognitive decline (PD-SCD, n = 6), mild cognitive impairment (PD-MCI, n = 3), dementia (PDD, n = 3), and carers (n = 3). Findings resulted in the formulation of 25 recommendations from four overarching categories and with several inter-related themes: (1) Pre-assessment (clinicians' reluctance to assess; referrals; informed choice), (2) assessment (delivery of assessment; telehealth), (3) diagnosis (need for transparency; focused discussion; time to discuss), and (4) postdiagnostic care (follow-up assessment; information in plain language; advocating for PwPD). The national survey (n = 69 PwPD, n = 12 carers) found that all recommendations except one demonstrated high agreement (≥ 88%, median rating ≥ 4, IQR ≤ 1). Delivery of a cognitive diagnosis on the same day as cognitive testing was the only area that did not achieve consensus.
conclusionWe identified critical gaps in the diagnosis and management of cognitive symptoms within clinical services, and the subsequent implications for PwPD and their carers. These results provide a lived experience perspective to the development of best practice guidelines for cognitive evaluation in PD. PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: The project was endorsed by our Consumer and Community Involvement Group (CCIG), a research advisory board consisting of people with lived experience of Parkinson's Disease and dementia, including those caring for PwPD. The CCIG identified initial need for the research project, were involved in refining the focus group topic guide and refining the recommendations for the national survey.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.