Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41834402›Full record

ArticleJournal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD2026

Gait and movement analysis for discrimination between people with dementia and healthy control persons based on pose estimation and machine learning.

Mustafa Al-Hammadi, Hasan Fleyeh, Ilias Thomas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mustafa Al-HammadiSchool of Information and Engineering, Dalarna University, Borlänge, Sweden.ORCID 0009-0005-9877-725X
Hasan FleyehSchool of Information and Engineering, Dalarna University, Borlänge, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-1429-2345
Ilias ThomasSchool of Information and Engineering, Dalarna University, Borlänge, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-5795-7677

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BackgroundDementia disorders are affecting millions of people globally, characterized by memory loss, communication difficulties, and motor function decline. Accurate and early dementia detection is crucial for effective management and treatment. Gait analysis offers a non-invasive method for dementia detection by identifying subtle changes in walking patterns that often precede cognitive symptoms.ObjectiveThis study aims to evaluate the clinical utility of video-based gait analysis using the Timed Up and Go (TUG) test under single and dual-task conditions (TUGdt) for distinguishing individuals with dementia disorders from healthy controls (HCs).MethodThe study implemented three machine learning models: Support Vector Machine (SVM), Logistic Regression (LR), and Random Forest (RF), to discriminate between persons with dementia and HCs. The dataset consists of a cohort of 64 people with dementia (47 with Alzheimer's disease) and 67 HCs. The participants performed the TUG test as a single and dual-task (TUGdt). In the TUGdt, participants performed the TUG test while simultaneously completing an additional cognitive task (i.e., animal naming (TUGdt-NA) or reciting months in reverse order (TUGdt-MB)).ResultsThe results showed that dual-task classification outperformed the single-task. The SVM algorithm achieved the highest accuracy in the TUGdt-NA task (accuracy of 87% ± 5.1 and recall of 86.6% ± 3.2) using 5-fold cross-validation and accuracy of 85.5% and recall of 89.5% using Leave-One-Out Cross-Validation (LOOCV) in the TUGdt-MB task.ConclusionsIn summary, video-based gait features effectively distinguish people with dementia from HCs, particularly under dual-tasking, offering cost-effective, automated, and non-invasive pre-screening to complement clinical assessments.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseDementiaGaitGait AnalysisMachine LearningAgedAged, 80 and overDual-Task TestsFemaleHumansMaleMovementRandom ForestSupport Vector MachineAlzheimer's diseasedementiagaitmachine learningmovement analysispose estimation

Identifiers

PMID41834402
PMCPMC13110332

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.