ArticleTurk gogus kalp damar cerrahisi dergisi2026
Vitamin K antagonists and structural valve deterioration in bioprosthetic aortic valves.
Article in Turk gogus kalp damar cerrahisi dergisi, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: To evaluate the effect of postoperative vitamin K antagonist (VKA) exposure on structural valve deterioration (SVD) after bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement (AVR). Methods: We retrospectively analysed 123 patients who underwent surgical bioprosthetic AVR between 2010 and 2025 with adequate echocardiographic follow-up. VKA exposure was recorded during follow-up; for the primary time-fixed Cox model, VKA exposure was defined as cumulative postoperative use ≥3 months (yes/no), and VKA was additionally evaluated as a time-varying covariate in a time-dependent sensitivity analysis. The primary endpoint was VARC-3-defined SVD; secondary endpoints were all-cause mortality, bioprosthetic valve failure, and reoperation/valve-in-valve. Results: Mean age was 71.3±6.1 years; 65% were male. Porcine and bovine bioprostheses accounted for 71.5% and 28.5% of implants. Median SVD-free survival was 2073 days (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0-4212) in VKA users, while the median was not reached in non-users; the difference was significant (logrank p=0.017). In the adjusted time-fixed Cox model, VKA exposure was associated with higher SVD risk (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 2.14; 95% CI 1.08-4.26; p=0.030). In a time-dependent sensitivity Cox model with VKA as a time-varying covariate, periods on VKA were similarly associated with higher SVD hazard (hazard ratio 2.16; 95% CI 1.10-4.23; p=0.025). Porcine bioprostheses were also independently associated with higher SVD risk (aHR 2.71; 95% CI 1.09-6.76; p=0.031). Conclusion: After bioprosthetic AVR, VKA exposure and porcine bioprostheses were independently associated with SVD. Antithrombotic strategies should consider the potential long-term adverse effects of VKA in the context of prosthesis material and patient characteristics. Prospective multicenter studies are needed to confirm these findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.