Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41834802›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in reproductive health2026

Precautions for polygenic embryo selection: prohibition or cautious use.

Tetsuya Ishii

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in reproductive health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Tetsuya IshiiOffice of Health and Safety, Hokkaido University, Sapporo City, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Polygenic scores derived from inborn genetic variation are expected to predict individuals' complex traits. Preimplantation genetic testing for polygenic scores is already offered to help parents select embryos deemed "healthy" and/or "intelligent", raising ethical concerns. This paper analyzes the implications of polygenic embryo selection and proposes policy responses. Although substantial clinical uncertainty persists, use is likely to expand because parents seek desirable traits. Yet resulting offspring may not meet such expectations due to environmental influences (including parental behavior), offspring's genomes, and their autonomy. These practices risk generating socio-ethical harms, including false expectations, child objectification, and trait-based stigma. Professional societies and policymakers should therefore warn parents about these risks, and consider prohibiting polygenic embryo selection, although they might eventually permit cautious use for serious late-onset diseases.

Indexed as

embryo selectionethicspolicypolygenic scoreprecautionpreimplantation genetic testingregulationtrait prediction

Identifiers

PMID41834802
PMCPMC12979420

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.