ArticleOcular oncology and pathology2026
Multimodal Imaging Features of Bilateral Diffuse Uveal Melanocytic Proliferation: A Systematic Review of 82 Patients.
Article in Ocular oncology and pathology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Bilateral diffuse uveal melanocytic proliferation (BDUMP) is a rare paraneoplastic syndrome characterized by proliferation of benign melanocytes throughout the uveal tract. Our purpose was to quantify the prevalence of multimodal imaging findings in BDUMP and identify features that most reliably characterize this rare paraneoplastic syndrome. Methods: We conducted a systematic review following PRISMA 2020 guidelines, searching PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Embase through September 2025. We included case reports and series providing patient-level data on BDUMP with associated imaging. Prevalence rates were calculated using a documented denominator approach with 95% Wilson score confidence intervals. Results: Sixty-seven studies encompassing 82 patients were included. Median age was 67 years (range 35-88); 54.9% were female. Gynecologic (25.9%), gastrointestinal (22.2%), and lung (17.3%) cancers were most common. Optical coherence tomography revealed retinal pigment epithelium irregularities in 91.8% and subretinal fluid in 90.2% of patients, exceeding the prevalence of classical orange-red patches on fundus photography (82.6%). Fundus autofluorescence showed alternating hypo/hyperautofluorescence in 76.6%. Choroidal thickening was present in 88.9% on ultrasonography. Bacillary layer detachment was identified in 16.4% of cases. Conclusion: OCT-based structural abnormalities are more consistently present than Gass's classical funduscopic signs. These quantitative data may assist earlier recognition of BDUMP and suggest that updated diagnostic criteria should incorporate multimodal imaging findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.