Evidence mapPaperPMID 41835116Full record

ArticleJournal of inflammation research2026

Rethinking Corticosteroid Therapy in Pediatric Neurology.

Wei-Sheng Lin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of inflammation research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Wei-Sheng LinDepartment of Pediatrics, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-9016-2067

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Corticosteroids have long been a cornerstone in the management of many pediatric neurological disorders. However, their broad immunomodulatory effects raise concerns in the era of precision medicine, where more targeted approaches are increasingly favored, warranting a critical reappraisal of their roles in pediatric neurology. Of particular importance is the possibility that corticosteroids may potentiate components of the innate immune responses and thereby exacerbate neuroinflammation. Accordingly, disease-specific immunopathogenesis should be considered in therapeutic decision-making. The potential for adverse effects, especially with long-term use, remains a major consideration and underscores the need for careful risk-benefit analysis. Several therapeutic innovations, including selective glucocorticoid receptor modulators (such as vamorolone) and intra-erythrocyte dexamethasone delivery, have shown promising safety profiles in Duchenne muscular dystrophy and ataxia telangiectasia, respectively. Beyond the well-established role of corticosteroids in infantile epileptic spasms syndrome, recent evidence suggests that corticosteroids may benefit a substantial proportion of patients with various forms of epilepsy that are resistant to conventional antiseizure medications. Further research is warranted to define the optimal use of corticosteroids with respect to dosing, formulation, timing, and route of administration in various pediatric neurological disorders.

Indexed as

corticosteroidsglucocorticoid receptor modulatorglucocorticoid toxicityintra-erythrocyte drug deliveryneuroinflammationvamorolone

Identifiers

PMID41835116
PMCPMC12988657

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.