ArticleArchives of clinical and medical case reports2025
A Critical Analysis of the Clinical Use of Incretin-Based Therapies: Efficacy and Adverse Events.
Article in Archives of clinical and medical case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cardiometabolic Effects of Traditional South Asian Diets and the Growing Burden of Metabolic Syndrome.Archives of internal medicine research · 2026Article
- Outcomes of Diabetes Management with Continuous Glucose Monitoring Technology.Archives of internal medicine research · 2026Article
- Limitations of Current Therapies and Barriers in Alzheimer's Disease.Archives of internal medicine research · 2026Article
- Cardiorenal Protective Effects of Finerenone in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.Archives of internal medicine research · 2026Article
- Tirzepatide and the gut microbiota-obesity axis: metabolic mechanisms and therapeutic perspectives.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Review
- Cost-efficient and Accurate Risk Assessment Instruments in Type 2 Diabetics with Greatest Risk for Cardiovascular Disease.Cardiology and cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Obesity is a major public health challenge in the United States, despite widespread implementation of regulated diet plans, exercise programs, behavioral interventions, and surgical procedures. The emergence of incretin-based therapies, particularly GLP-1 (glucagon-like peptide-1) and GIP (glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide) receptor agonists, has transformed the therapeutic landscape for initially type 2 diabetes and now obesity. Beyond their metabolic effects, incretin therapies exert meaningful cardiovascular, gastrointestinal, and neuroprotective actions. Semaglutide, a GLP-1 receptor agonist, and tripeptide, a dual GLP-1/GIP agonist, demonstrate substantial weight reduction, improved glycemic control, and reductions in cardiometabolic risk factors. Tirzepatide consistently produces greater weight loss effects than semaglutide, likely due to synergistic dual-receptor effects. However, these therapies are accompanied by adverse effects, most commonly gastrointestinal disturbances, and, less frequently, gallbladder disease, pancreatitis, or rare ophthalmologic concerns. Long-term safety data remain limited, particularly in older adults, pediatric patients, pregnant women, and individuals with comorbid disease. Emerging evidence also suggests potential roles in cancer prevention, hypertension, and neurodegenerative disease. As the indications for incretin-based therapies continue to expand, longer-duration trials and more diverse study populations will be essential to fully examine their long-term clinical effects. Though these agents hold considerable promise, careful and informed use remain vital.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.