Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41835411›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2026

Factors influencing the implementation of workplace-based health interventions for non-communicable disease prevention: a scoping review.

Aliza K C Bhandari, Kaung Suu Lwin, Phuong The Nguyen, Zin Wai Htay, Drishti Shrestha, Junko Saito, Akiko Yaguchi-Saito, Erika Ota, Taichi Shimazu

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Aliza K C BhandariGraduate School of Public Health, St. Luke's International University, Tokyo, Japan.
Kaung Suu LwinSchool of Human and Health Sciences, University of Huddersfield, Huddersfield, United Kingdom.
Phuong The NguyenHitotsubashi Institute for Advanced Study (HIAS), Hitotsubashi University, Tokyo, Japan.
Zin Wai HtayDepartment of Global Health Policy, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Drishti ShresthaGraduate School of Public Health, St. Luke's International University, Tokyo, Japan.
Junko SaitoDivision of Behavioral Sciences, National Cancer Center Institute for Cancer Control, National Cancer Center, Tokyo, Japan.
Akiko Yaguchi-SaitoDivision of Behavioral Sciences, National Cancer Center Institute for Cancer Control, National Cancer Center, Tokyo, Japan.
Erika OtaDepartment of Global Health Nursing, Graduate School of Nursing Science, St. Luke's International University, Tokyo, Japan.
Taichi ShimazuDivision of Behavioral Sciences, National Cancer Center Institute for Cancer Control, National Cancer Center, Tokyo, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Workplace health promotion interventions are effective in improving employee health. However, most interventions are temporary and cannot be sustained, and a comprehensive understanding of the factors that influence implementation is limited. Therefore, using the implementation framework, this scoping review aims to identify the barriers and facilitators influencing the implementation of workplace health promotion interventions for the prevention of non-communicable diseases. Methods: We searched databases such as PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus from January 1986 to August 2022 according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Consistent with the Arksey and O'Malley framework, two independent reviewers reviewed the titles and abstracts for eligibility, followed by full-text screening using a data extraction form. Subsequently, a narrative summary of the barriers and facilitators identified from the included articles was synthesized and categorized into the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). The identified barriers and facilitators were stratified according to the implementation outcomes. Results: Of the 38,384 articles identified, 610 articles were eligible for full-text screening, and 53 articles were included in the final analysis. Over 80% of the studies had applied a qualitative or mixed-methods approach, and the most common topics of intervention were reducing physical inactivity and promoting exercise (36%); moreover, 60% of the studies targeted interventions in medium- to large-sized organizations. Most factors were identified in the inner setting domain of the CFIR. The predominant facilitators were evidence strength and quality and leadership engagement, whereas structural characteristics, relative priority, and available resources were the most identified predominant barriers to the implementation of workplace health promotion interventions. Conclusion: The barriers and facilitators identified in this study can be used to implement a process to develop a strategy that targets the identified determinants to improve workplace health promotion interventions and their implementation.

Indexed as

Health PromotionNoncommunicable DiseasesOccupational HealthWorkplaceHumansWorking Conditionsbarriersfacilitatorsfactorshealth promotion interventionsimplementation outcomeworkplace

Identifiers

PMID41835411
PMCPMC12979459

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.