Evidence mapPaperPMID 41835477Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2026

Predicting major adverse cardiovascular events in diabetic and non-diabetic patients with coronary artery disease: visual models integrating multi-parametric coronary computed tomography angiography and pericoronary adipose tissue radiomics.

Ming Chen, Xiyi Huang, Lizhu Ouyang, Xinjie Chen, Jialing Pan, Liwen Wang, Lanni Zhou, Fusheng Ouyang, Qiugen Hu, Baoliang Guo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Ming Chen *Department of Radiology, The Eighth Affiliated Hospital of Southern Medical University, Foshan, Guangdong, China.
Xiyi Huang *Department of Clinical Laboratory, Lecong Hospital of Shunde, Foshan, Guangdong, China.
Lizhu Ouyang *Department of Radiology, The Eighth Affiliated Hospital of Southern Medical University, Foshan, Guangdong, China.
Xinjie Chen *Department of Radiology, The Eighth Affiliated Hospital of Southern Medical University, Foshan, Guangdong, China.
Jialing PanDepartment of Radiology, The Eighth Affiliated Hospital of Southern Medical University, Foshan, Guangdong, China.
Liwen WangDepartment of Radiology, The Eighth Affiliated Hospital of Southern Medical University, Foshan, Guangdong, China.
Lanni ZhouDepartment of Radiology, The Eighth Affiliated Hospital of Southern Medical University, Foshan, Guangdong, China.
Fusheng OuyangDepartment of Radiology, The Eighth Affiliated Hospital of Southern Medical University, Foshan, Guangdong, China.
Qiugen HuDepartment of Radiology, The Eighth Affiliated Hospital of Southern Medical University, Foshan, Guangdong, China.
Baoliang GuoDepartment of Radiology, The Eighth Affiliated Hospital of Southern Medical University, Foshan, Guangdong, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To compare the application value differences of PCAT radiomic features, clinical risk features and computed tomography (CT)-derived parameters in predicting Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in patients with/without diabetes. Methods: Retrospective analysis included 1,000 coronary atherosclerosis patients undergoing Coronary CT angiography (CCTA) (with/without diabetes: 274/726) from the Eighth Affiliated Hospital of Southern Medical University. Clinical/CT data were collected, extracting 285 PCAT radiomic features from three major coronaries. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression identified MACE-associated radiomic features. Patients underwent random 6:4 training/testing cohort split. Four predictive models were constructed: Model 1 (clinical factors), Model 2 (imaging factors), Model 3 (imaging-radiomic features), Model 4 (all factors). Results: In the training set, Model 4 showed the best performance: The area under the curves (AUC) of 0.803 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.756-0.850] and 0.854 (95% CI: 0.779-0.929) for groups with/without diabetes, respectively. Model 3 outperformed Model 2 in patients without diabetes ( Conclusion: PCAT radiomics, CT-derived parameters, and plaque features demonstrate differential predictive value for MACE in patients with/without diabetes. Combining these with clinical risk factors provides most effective model for both.

Indexed as

coronary arteriosclerosiscoronary CT angiographydiabetesmajor adverse cardiovascular eventspericoronary adipose tissue

Identifiers

PMID41835477
PMCPMC12982186

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.