ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2026
Epicardial adipose tissue radiomic features from pre-procedural CT to predict atrial fibrillation recurrence after catheter ablation for pulmonary vein isolation.
Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: This study aimed to develop and validate a machine learning model that integrates radiomic features of epicardial adipose tissue (EAT) from pre-procedural CT angiography with clinical variables to predict atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). Materials and methods: This retrospective study initially included 1,551 AF patients who underwent PVI. After data integrity screening and 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) to balance confounding factors, the final analysis cohort consisted of 302 patients (151 with recurrence and 151 without recurrence). EAT was segmented from preoperative CT angiography images using a SwinUNETR model, which was pre-trained via transfer learning on manually annotated images. Following segmentation, radiomic features were extracted. Subsequently, six machine learning models were developed and evaluated. Results: The SwinUNETR segmentation model achieved a dice similarity coefficient of 0.87. For AF recurrence prediction, the fusion model demonstrated superior and robust performance in internal validation. The random forest-based fusion model achieved the highest area under the curve (AUC) of 0.81 (95% CI: 0.59-0.87). Key predictive features included NT-proBNP and texture heterogeneity features from EAT, which align with known pathophysiological mechanisms involving systemic inflammation, metabolic dysregulation, and local atrial adipose tissue remodeling. Conclusion: A fusion model incorporating EAT radiomics and clinical variables effectively predicts AF recurrence after PVI, with ensemble methods showing optimal performance. This study provides a multiscale, interpretable computational tool for individualized postoperative risk stratification, highlighting the complementary role of EAT imaging biomarkers to systemic clinical factors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.