ArticleACS omega2026
Advanced Biomaterials in Tissue Engineering Based on Antibacterial and Antibiofilm Nanocomposites for Multidrug-Resistant Wound Pathogens.
Article in ACS omega, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The treatment of chronic wounds is critically challenged by resilient biofilms formed by multidrug-resistant (MDR) pathogens, which are largely impervious to conventional antibiotics. This study addresses this challenge by engineering a multifunctional hydrogel dressing that synergistically integrates bacterial cellulose (BC), MXene nanosheets, and hydroxyapatite (HAp). Plays a critical dual role in the composite, significantly boosting bioactivity while also stabilizing the MXene to prevent oxidation and maintain its antibacterial properties. As a result, the BC/MXene/HAp composite achieved a near-total (98%) eradication of viable cells in mature biofilms of challenging MDR pathogens, including MRSA and FQRPA. Such activity is driven by a dual-mechanism that effectively disrupts both the initial attachment of bacteria and the structural scaffold of established biofilms. Complementing this efficacy, in vitro assays with NIH-3T3 fibroblasts confirm that the composite supports excellent cell adhesion, proliferation, and metabolic activity, highlighting its high biocompatibility. This work demonstrates a nonantibiotic strategy to combat biofilms through a synergistically designed biomaterial. Given its robust performance and multifunctionality, this platform is a promising candidate for the development of advanced therapeutic dressings in regenerative wound care.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.