ArticleInternational journal of women's health2026
Improved Outcomes with Nerve-Sparing Technique: A Retrospective Comparison of Colorectal Surgeries for Bowel Endometriosis.
Article in International journal of women's health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Study Objective: The aim of this study was to describe surgical outcomes after different types of colorectal surgery for bowel endometriosis and to present the feasibility of LscPR in bowel endometriosis. Design: Retrospective analysis. Setting: Gynecological department at the Jinhua Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital. Interventions and Measurements: From January 2014 to November 2024, we recruited 320 patients with bowel endometriosis who underwent LscShR (n=108), LscDR (n=70), LscSgR (n=73), or LscPR (n=69). Main Results: Over a median follow-up of 4.6 years (range: 1-10 years), one patient rejected subsequent treatment in the LscShR and LscSgR groups, respectively, and two patients were lost to follow-up in the LscDR group; a total of 316 women completed the follow-up questionnaire. The total complication rate was highest in the LscSgR group (16.67%), followed by the LscDR (5.88%), LscPR (4.35%), and LscShR (1.87%) groups, with a statistically significant difference ( Conclusion: Within the limitations of a retrospective study, our data suggest that LscPR is an effective approach for bowel endometriosis, associated with significant symptom improvement and fewer complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.