Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41835869›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026

Trajectory prediction model of diabetes distress in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a 12-month prospective longitudinal study.

Yu-Yun Zhang, Wei Li, Qing-Yan Wang, Fang Zhao, Qun Wang, Yu Sheng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yu-Yun ZhangSchool of Nursing, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Wei LiDepartment of Endocrinology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing, China.
Qing-Yan WangSchool of Nursing, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, China.
Fang ZhaoDepartment of Endocrinology, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China.
Qun WangEndocrinology and Metabolism Department, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Yu ShengSchool of Nursing, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Clarifying heterogeneous diabetes distress (DD) trajectories and their predictors from a dynamic perspective is crucial. We aimed to develop a trajectory prediction model for dynamic DD. Methods: This prospective longitudinal study included 443 adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus who completed the demographics and diabetes characteristics questionnaire, scales measuring lifestyles and psychological factors (at baseline), and the Chinese version of the Diabetes Distress Scale (at baseline and at 3-, 6-, 9-, and 12-month follow-ups). After identifying the factors associated with DD, growth mixture modeling was used to determine latent longitudinal DD trajectory classes and develop a trajectory prediction model. Results: Five DD trajectories were identified: persistently low DD (65.01%), persistently moderate DD (25.28%), persistently high DD (3.61%), decreasing DD (3.16%), and increasing DD (2.94%). Using the persistently low DD group as the reference, people with no religious belief ( Conclusion: Demographics, diabetes characteristics, lifestyles, and psychosocial factors can predict dynamic heterogeneous trajectories of DD. The trajectory prediction model will enable healthcare professionals to anticipate DD trajectories and conduct targeted interventions [Trial registration: ChiCTR2100047071].

Indexed as

diabetes distressgrowth mixture modelinglongitudinal studytrajectorytype 2 diabetes mellitus

Identifiers

PMID41835869
PMCPMC12979389

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.