ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2026
Sex differences in global metrics of brain size across the lifespan.
Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Regional Brain Volume Variation Across Adulthood: A Cross-Sectional MRI Analysis of Age, Sex, and Hemispheric Asymmetry.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- The Relationship Between Gaze and Classroom Conversation in Primary Education in Chile: A Comparison by Sex and Urban-Rural Context.Journal of eye movement research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: While global brain volume differences between males and females have been shown to manifest during prenatal life, it is unclear whether global differences remain stable or show variability over the lifespan. Therefore, our goal was to use the existing literature coupled with large-population-based studies to assess age-related differences in effect size estimates of brain size between males and females over the life-span. Methods: We quantified effect size measures (Cohen's d) of sex differences in terms of head circumference using data drawn from the literature of prenatal (14 weeks to birth) ultrasounds of Results: Head circumference was consistently larger in males from fetal life through early childhood, with effect sizes typically ranging from ∼0.3 to 0.5 across studies and developmental stages. Males exhibited greater surface area and cortical volume across development, with effect sizes increasing from ∼0.4 at age 5 to ∼1.4 by age 24, after which they remained relatively stable. Cortical thickness showed a female advantage during childhood that diminished by mid-adolescence. Conclusion: The effect size of sex differences in global brain metrics does not remain constant across the lifespan. The underlying mechanisms are likely to involve endocrine and other neurodevelopmental processes. Future studies, especially preclinical and longitudinal studies beginning in the prenatal period may offer insight into the underlying mechanisms and the potential for translation of these findings, assessing the curves in patients with neurodevelopmental disorders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.