ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2026
Early administration of shenfu injection for the incidence of sepsis-induced cardiomyopathy in septic patients: a randomized controlled trial.
Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Sepsis-induced cardiomyopathy (SIC) is a severe complication of sepsis that markedly increases mortality. Owing to its complex pathogenesis, no targeted drugs for SIC is currently available, highlighting the need for preventive interventions. This study aimed to evaluate whether early administration of Shenfu Injection (SFI) could prevent SIC. Methods: Patients diagnosed with sepsis 3.0 upon intensive care unit (ICU) admission but without SIC were randomly assigned to either the SFI group or control group via envelope randomization. The SFI group received intravenous SFI (200 mL/day) in addition to standard sepsis or septic shock management for 7 days (minimum 72 h if discontinued due to ICU transfer or death). The control group received an equivalent volume of saline alongside standard care. The primary outcome was the incidence of SIC within 7 days. Results: A total of 152 patients (76 per group) were analyzed. The incidence of SIC within 7 days was 9.2% in both groups. In the generalized linear mixed model (GLMM) adjusted for gender, age, septic shock and the baseline value of N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), the interaction between time and group had a significant effect on NT-proBNP levels (P = 0.004). No significant differences were observed between groups in hemodynamic parameters, immune inflammatory indicators, organ function, vasoactive drug use, 7-day fluid balance, 28-day mortality, duration of mechanical ventilation, continuous renal replacement therapy duration, ICU stay, or total hospital stay. Conclusion: Early application of SFI did not significantly reduce the incidence of SIC in ICU patients with sepsis. Clinical Trial Registration: [https://www.chictr.org.cn/], identifier [ChiCTR2400088766].
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.