ArticlePatient preference and adherence2026
Associated Factors of Different Cardiac Rehabilitation Adherence Profiles Post-PCI: A Latent Profile Analysis.
Article in Patient preference and adherence, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to identify distinct in-hospital cardiac rehabilitation (CR) adherence profiles and explore their associated clinical and sociodemographic factors among patients following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted among patients undergoing Phase I cardiac rehabilitation following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) who were hospitalized in the cardiology department between June and July 2025 (n=384). Data were collected using a general information questionnaire and a treatment adherence questionnaire (Since the study population consisted of inpatients undergoing PCI followed by phase I cardiac rehabilitation, the dimension of follow-up compliance was excluded). LPA, a person-centered method that identifies unobserved subgroups (profiles) based on response patterns, was prespecified to classify CR adherence profiles. Multinomial logistic regression was performed to examine factors associated with profile membership. Clinical indicators (number of diseased vessels, LVEF, LDL-C, and serum creatinine) were included as candidate predictors; after LASSO selection, LDL-C and number of diseased vessels were retained and entered the final multinomial logistic regression model as continuous variables (original values). Results: Three distinct CR adherence profiles were identified: Low CR Adherence (125/384, 32.55%), Medium CR Adherence (169/384, 44.01%), and High CR Adherence (90/384, 23.44%). Profile membership was significantly associated with gender, living situation, family monthly income, residential distance, smartphone use/proficiency and LDL-C ( Conclusion: CR adherence among post-PCI patients was overall moderate-to-low, with substantial heterogeneity across adherence patterns. The associated sociodemographic and contextual factors may help inform profile-based, tailored support to improve CR adherence after PCI. Given the cross-sectional design, these associations are non-causal and should be validated in future multicenter longitudinal and intervention studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.