Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41836413›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in immunology2026

Mapping benefit, risk, and opportunity in PAD4 inhibition.

Caio Santos Bonilha, Flavio Protasio Veras

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Caio Santos BonilhaInstitute of Infection, Immunity and Inflammation, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Flavio Protasio VerasInstitute of Biomedical Sciences, Federal University of Alfenas, Alfenas, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Peptidylarginine deiminase 4 (PAD4) is increasingly targeted to modulate inflammatory pathology, yet its inhibition produces biological effects that extend beyond the processes it was originally designed to suppress. While PAD4 targeting has largely been pursued to limit neutrophil extracellular trap (NET) formation, accumulating data indicate that PAD4 activity also shapes immune regulation through citrullination of non-histone substrates, with consequences for antigen presentation, cytokine function, and adaptive immune activation. These broader effects introduce important considerations for translation, as PAD4 inhibition can simultaneously attenuate tissue-damaging inflammation and undermine protective host responses. In this review, we examine PAD4 targeting through a benefit-risk-opportunity framework that integrates enzymatic specificity, cellular context, and disease setting. We discuss how suppression of NET-driven pathology underlies therapeutic benefit in thrombo-inflammatory disease, how impaired control of microbial dissemination represents a central risk in infection, and how direct effects on dendritic- and T-cell-mediated responses may be leveraged in autoimmune contexts. Rather than reflecting unintended drug activity, many immune effects attributed to off-target inhibition arise from disruption of citrullination-dependent regulatory pathways. This perspective provides a mechanistic basis for selecting indications, designing combination strategies, and defining appropriate safety endpoints, supporting a more precise and context-aware approach to PAD4 targeting in immune-mediated disease.

Indexed as

Enzyme InhibitorsProtein-Arginine Deiminase Type 4AnimalsCitrullinationExtracellular TrapsHumansInflammationEnzyme InhibitorsPADI4 protein, humanProtein-Arginine Deiminase Type 4immune regulationneutrophil extracellular trapsneutrophilsprotein citrullinationtranslation immunology

Identifiers

PMID41836413
PMCPMC12979119

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.