Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41836580›Full record

ReviewJournal of orthopaedic translation2026

Graphene oxide-modified PEEK composites: Properties and applications in orthopaedic repair - A review.

Mingjing Zhang, Shuzhong Liu, Jinyi Xing, An Song, Liqi Ng, Nan Tao, Xin Su, Changning Sun, Chaozong Liu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of orthopaedic translation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Mingjing ZhangInstitute of Orthopaedic and Musculoskeletal Science, University College London, Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital, London, HA7 4LP, UK.
Shuzhong LiuInstitute of Orthopaedic and Musculoskeletal Science, University College London, Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital, London, HA7 4LP, UK.
Jinyi XingDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, 100730, China.
An SongInstitute of Orthopaedic and Musculoskeletal Science, University College London, Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital, London, HA7 4LP, UK.
Liqi NgInstitute of Orthopaedic and Musculoskeletal Science, University College London, Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital, London, HA7 4LP, UK.
Nan TaoInstitute of Orthopaedic and Musculoskeletal Science, University College London, Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital, London, HA7 4LP, UK.
Xin SuDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, 100730, China.
Changning SunInstitute of Orthopaedic and Musculoskeletal Science, University College London, Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital, London, HA7 4LP, UK.
Chaozong LiuInstitute of Orthopaedic and Musculoskeletal Science, University College London, Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital, London, HA7 4LP, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Critical-sized bone defect repair remains a major challenge in orthopaedics and tissue engineering. Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) has attracted wide attention due to its excellent mechanical compatibility and radiological transparency; however, its inherent bioinertness and insufficient antibacterial properties restrict its clinical utility. In recent years, the incorporation of graphene oxide (GO) has markedly improved the biological performance of PEEK. GO can increase surface hydrophilicity and roughness, enhance protein/ion adsorption, and promote osteoblast adhesion and differentiation, while simultaneously strengthening antibacterial and immunomodulatory effects without compromising, and in some cases even enhancing, mechanical performance. In vitro studies demonstrate that GO-PEEK stimulates osteogenic gene expression and mineralized nodule formation, while in vivo animal models confirm superior osseointegration and new bone formation compared with controls. Synergistic modifications, such as combination with hydroxyapatite, metallic ions, or antimicrobial peptides, further amplify both osteogenic and antibacterial outcomes. Nevertheless, clinical translation of GO-PEEK remains hampered by challenges including long-term stability, potential particulate-related risks, the dynamic balance between antibacterial and osteogenic functions, and issues of manufacturing scalability, consistency, and sterilization compatibility. Future research should focus on establishing a "structure-property-safety" design paradigm, developing temporally programmed multifunctional strategies, and advancing 3D-printed personalized fabrication, with low-load applications such as alveolar or cranial bone repair as potential pioneer indications. Overall, GO-PEEK composites exhibit significant promise in contexts such as post-tumour bone reconstruction, dental implantation, and spinal or joint implants, and are expected to achieve successful clinical translation under evidence-based validation and standardised manufacturing pathways.

Indexed as

Bone repairClinical translationFunctionalizationGraphene oxide (GO)Graphene oxide-modified PEEK (GO-PEEK)Polyetheretherketone (PEEK)

Identifiers

PMID41836580
PMCPMC12988527

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.