ArticleEuropean heart journal. Digital health2026
Fully automated, deep learning, cardiac CT-based multimodal network for cardiovascular risk stratification in high-risk perioperative patients.
Article in European heart journal. Digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Deep Learning and Cardiovascular Diseases: An Updated Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
24 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aims: Major adverse cardiac events (MACE) significantly impact perioperative morbidity and mortality. We aimed to develop a fully automated multimodal deep learning (DL) system integrating patient demographics, comorbidities, and coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) findings to optimize risk prediction. Methods and results: We included 639 patients undergoing CCTA as part of perioperative risk assessment for elective non-cardiac surgery. Convolutional neural networks automatically identified coronary artery disease reporting and data system (CAD-RADS) scores and segmented the left ventricle, aorta, and heart. These imaging features were combined with patient demographics and comorbidities to predict MACE risk. We evaluated the performance of our multimodal model against the revised cardiac risk index (RCRI) using gradient boosting decision tree modelling and area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curves. Among 639 patients (mean age 70 ± 9 years, 56% males, median RCRI 1), 61% underwent orthopaedic surgery, 27% vascular surgery and the rest abdominal/pelvic or spine surgery. 45 patients experienced MACE within 30 days. Automated CAD-RADS (AUROC = 0.69) demonstrated comparable performance to human analysis (AUROC = 0.67, Conclusion: Our multimodal system built using automated CAD-RADS, anatomical segmentations and patient demographics outperforms both human expert and automated CAD-RADS for MACE prediction. This approach has the potential to enhance patient outcomes by leveraging the synergy between automated imaging and clinical data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.