ArticleFrontiers in bioinformatics2026
An efficient computational chemistry approach to generating negative data for drug discovery pipeline validation.
Article in Frontiers in bioinformatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- A curated benchmark for cofolding models on kinase conformational states.npj drug discovery · 2026Article
- Exploring the Anti-Inflammatory Potential of Saudi Propolis Through Phytochemical Characterization, Molecular Docking, and Dynamic Simulation.Pharmaceutics · 2026Article
- Beyond the Score: Fixed-Budget Benchmarking of Virtual Screening Integration Strategies for Decision-Centric Drug Discovery.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- In Silico Isomerization Produces Apt Negative Data for VHTS Validation.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence and Protein Design: A retrospective study on 20-year emerging trends and core research areas from bibliometric perspectives.Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins · 2026Article
- Non-Classical Binding Mechanisms of Ferrocene-Modified Imatinib and Nilotinib Analogues in BCR-ABL1 Kinase Revealed by Computational Analysis.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- An efficient computational chemistry approach to generating negative data for drug discovery pipeline validation.Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Modern virtual high-throughput screening (VHTS) pipelines can be suboptimally validated, with no rigorous studies conclusively demonstrating that every one of their steps reliably adds increasing enrichment atop the baseline random hit rate. Moreover, what little benchmarking studies are available primarily focus on the docking aspect of the pipelines, which is usually only the beginning or near the beginning, and even there, authors tend to use flawed data sets that artificially inflate performance metrics. Herein, we present an alternative method to pipeline validation and data set generation that requires no additional experimental work and expenditure, yet offers vast amounts of negative data that can be used in VHTS pipeline validation. By randomizing ligands across published experimental structures and generating structural isomers of known binders, practically unlimited amounts of negative data can be generated. Such sets of positive and negative data points match closely in key molecular properties and are well suited to pipeline validation. Once such sets are generated, they are to be run through any proposed pipeline, assessing performance at every step. We stress the importance of using negative data of adequate quality and quantity in validation studies to definitively and verifiably demonstrate the utility of a given tool or workflow. Our goal is to help distinguish tools and pipelines that truly accelerate hit discovery and lead optimization from ones that promise to do so but actually do not, whereupon academia and industry can begin to tackle the many unaddressed medical needs of the 21st century.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.