Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41836887›Full record

ArticleTranslational animal science2026

Evaluation of milk-based and egg-based semen extenders for extended storage of ram semen at 4°C.

Emily R Schoelerman, Tyler J Weide, Karl C Kerns

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational animal science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Emily R SchoelermanDepartment of Animal Science, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, 50011, United States.
Tyler J WeideDepartment of Animal Science, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, 50011, United States.
Karl C KernsDepartment of Animal Science, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, 50011, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7425-0131

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ram semen cryopreservation and liquid storage are essential tools for reproductive management in sheep, but remain limited by the sensitivity of sperm to cold shock and oxidative damage. Commercial extenders aim to preserve sperm function, yet differences in biochemical composition may influence their efficacy across key indicators of fertility. This study evaluated the effects of two commercial extenders, INRA96 and OviPlus, on ram sperm quality during liquid storage at 4°C over a 96-h period. Semen samples were collected from mature rams and diluted into each extender, then assessed at 0, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, and 96 h post-collection for membrane integrity, acrosomal remodeling, reactive oxygen species (ROS), and zinc signatures using image-based flow cytometry (IBFC), as well as motility parameters measured with Computer Assisted Semen Analysis (CASA). While both extenders supported initial sperm viability, OviPlus had significantly less plasma membrane destabilization (timepoints 0, 12, 36, 48;

Indexed as

artificial inseminationliquid storageram semensemen extenderzinc signature

Identifiers

PMID41836887
PMCPMC12986770

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.