ArticleChina CDC weekly2026
Machine Learning Models for Predicting Latent Tuberculosis Infection Risk in Close Contacts of Patients with Pulmonary Tuberculosis - Henan Province, China, 2024.
Article in China CDC weekly, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Factors associated with pulmonary tuberculosis in LTBI individuals screened from close contacts: a retrospective case-control study.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: We explored risk factors for latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) and developed a risk prediction model using machine learning algorithms. Methods: Patients with active pulmonary TB in months 3 to 6 of anti-TB treatment in Henan Province, China, July-September 2024 were selected as index cases. Close contacts identified through epidemiological investigation underwent tuberculin-purified protein derivative testing to determine LTBI status. Face-to-face questionnaires were conducted to collect epidemiological data. The dataset was divided into training and testing sets (6:4), using a fixed random seed. Five models - logistic regression (LR), decision tree (DT), random forest (RF), support vector machines (SVM), and multilayer perceptron (MLP) - were trained and evaluated using the mean squared error (MSE) and coefficient of determination. The test set was subjected to external validation. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, area under the curve (AUC), and F1-scores were used to quantify predictive performance. Results: Among 795 close contacts, LTBI prevalence was 401 (50.5%). By MSE, models ranked: SVM (0.121), RF (0.165), DT (0.197), LR (0.229), and MLP (0.233). SVM identified five key predictors: contact type of index case, key population classification, residential area, frequency of participation in group activities, and etiological results. Internal validation showed strong performance (AUC=0.921, F1=0.858), whereas external validation showed moderate performance (AUC=0.752, F1=0.694). Conclusion: The SVM model incorporating contact type of index case, key population classification, residential area, frequency of group activity participation, and etiological results demonstrated robust predictive value for LTBI risk. This model shows promise for the targeted screening and management of high-risk populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.