Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41837255›Full record

ArticleChina CDC weekly2026

Machine Learning Models for Predicting Latent Tuberculosis Infection Risk in Close Contacts of Patients with Pulmonary Tuberculosis - Henan Province, China, 2024.

Dingyong Sun, Xuan Wu, Yanqiu Zhang, Weidong Wang, Mengya He, Linqi Diao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in China CDC weekly, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Dingyong Sun *Department of Tuberculosis Prevention and Control Center, Henan Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Zhengzhou City, Henan Province, China.
Xuan Wu *Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou City, Henan Province, China.
Yanqiu ZhangDepartment of Tuberculosis Prevention and Control Center, Henan Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Zhengzhou City, Henan Province, China.
Weidong WangDepartment of Tuberculosis Prevention and Control Center, Henan Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Zhengzhou City, Henan Province, China.
Mengya HeDepartment of Tuberculosis Prevention and Control Center, Henan Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Zhengzhou City, Henan Province, China.
Linqi DiaoDepartment of Tuberculosis Prevention and Control Center, Henan Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Zhengzhou City, Henan Province, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: We explored risk factors for latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) and developed a risk prediction model using machine learning algorithms. Methods: Patients with active pulmonary TB in months 3 to 6 of anti-TB treatment in Henan Province, China, July-September 2024 were selected as index cases. Close contacts identified through epidemiological investigation underwent tuberculin-purified protein derivative testing to determine LTBI status. Face-to-face questionnaires were conducted to collect epidemiological data. The dataset was divided into training and testing sets (6:4), using a fixed random seed. Five models - logistic regression (LR), decision tree (DT), random forest (RF), support vector machines (SVM), and multilayer perceptron (MLP) - were trained and evaluated using the mean squared error (MSE) and coefficient of determination. The test set was subjected to external validation. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, area under the curve (AUC), and F1-scores were used to quantify predictive performance. Results: Among 795 close contacts, LTBI prevalence was 401 (50.5%). By MSE, models ranked: SVM (0.121), RF (0.165), DT (0.197), LR (0.229), and MLP (0.233). SVM identified five key predictors: contact type of index case, key population classification, residential area, frequency of participation in group activities, and etiological results. Internal validation showed strong performance (AUC=0.921, F1=0.858), whereas external validation showed moderate performance (AUC=0.752, F1=0.694). Conclusion: The SVM model incorporating contact type of index case, key population classification, residential area, frequency of group activity participation, and etiological results demonstrated robust predictive value for LTBI risk. This model shows promise for the targeted screening and management of high-risk populations.

Indexed as

close contactslatent tuberculosis infectionmachine learningrisk factors

Identifiers

PMID41837255
PMCPMC12982115

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.