Evidence mapPaperPMID 41837280Full record

ReviewThe Journal of clinical investigation2026

Women's midlife: the front line of Alzheimer prevention.

Lisa Mosconi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of clinical investigation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Lisa MosconiDepartments of Neuroscience, Neurology and Radiology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York New York, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nearly two-thirds of patients with Alzheimer disease (AD) are women, most of them postmenopausal. While sex differences in AD have historically been attributed to women's relative longevity, accumulating evidence challenges that view, pointing to female sex-specific biological underpinnings. In particular, neuroendocrine aging and the hormonal shifts that accompany the menopause transition have emerged as potentially modifiable AD risk factors in women. Yet, key neuroendocrine aging-related factors linked to increased AD and dementia risk, such as early menopause, premenopausal bilateral oophorectomy, frequent vasomotor symptoms, and midlife cognitive and mood disturbances, remain underinvestigated. Additionally, although a growing evidence base highlights the potential of menopause hormone therapy for AD prevention, particularly in women undergoing oophorectomy, progress remains hindered by a lack of clinical trials and biomarker-driven studies. This Review calls for a paradigm shift: from viewing AD risk as a byproduct of generalized aging to validating midlife neuroendocrine aging as a distinct window of vulnerability, and an opportunity for prevention. By 2050, over 1.2 billion women worldwide will be in or approaching menopause. The stakes are global, and the opportunity is urgent: to redefine AD prevention through sex-specific, time-sensitive, and biologically informed strategies that translate science into scalable, actionable care.

Indexed as

AgingAlzheimer DiseaseMenopauseFemaleHumansMiddle AgedRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID41837280
PMCPMC12987622

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.