Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41837571›Full record

ArticleTrends in hearing

Assessing Visual Contributions to the Perception of Speech in Noise.

Lida C Alampounti, Hannah Cooper, Stuart Rosen, Jennifer K Bizley

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Trends in hearing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Lida C AlampountiEar Institute, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5335-6009
Hannah CooperEar Institute, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6471-1384
Stuart RosenSpeech, Hearing and Phonetic Sciences, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9376-2148
Jennifer K BizleyEar Institute, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6605-2362

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Investigations of the role of audiovisual integration in speech-in-noise perception have largely focused on the benefits provided by lipreading cues. Nonetheless, audiovisual temporal coherence can offer a complementary advantage in auditory selective attention tasks. We developed an audiovisual speech-in-noise test to assess the benefit of visually-conveyed phonetic information and visual contributions to auditory streaming. The test was a video version of the Children's Coordinate Response Measure with a noun as the second keyword (vCCRMn). The vCCRMn allowed us to measure speech reception thresholds in the presence of two competing talkers under three visual conditions: a full naturalistic video (AV), a video which was interrupted during the target word presentation (Inter), thus, providing no lipreading cues, and a static image of a talker with audio (A). In each case, the video/image could display either the target talker or one of the two competing maskers. We assessed speech reception thresholds in each visual condition in 37 young (≤35 years old) normal-hearing participants. Lipreading ability was independently assessed with the test of adult speechreading (TAS). Results showed that both target-coherent AV and Inter visual conditions offer participants a listening benefit over the static image with audio condition. Target coherent visual information provided the greatest listening advantage in the full audiovisual condition, but a robust advantage was also seen in the interrupted condition, where listeners were unable to lipread the target words. Together, our results are consistent with visual information providing multiple benefits to listening, through lipreading and enhanced auditory streaming.

Indexed as

LipreadingNoisePerceptual MaskingSpeech PerceptionVisual PerceptionAcoustic StimulationAdolescentAdultAttentionAudiometry, SpeechAuditory ThresholdCuesFemaleHumansMalePhotic Stimulationaudiovisual benefitaudiovisual integrationauditory scene analysisauditory streamingcoordinate response measureCRMlipreadingspeech perception in noisetemporal processing

Identifiers

PMID41837571
PMCPMC13009578

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.