ReviewThe Journal of physiology2026
Treating age-related loss of muscle mass and function: Where should we be focusing?
Review in The Journal of physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sixty-five years of physiology: Australia's continuing contributions.The Journal of physiology · 2026Article
- Turns and Turn-Related Falls: Stepping on a Rotating Platform as a Potential Approach to Foster Adapted Muscular and Neural Plasticity in Fragile Persons and Patients with Motor Impairment.Brain sciences · 2026Article
- Fiber type specific tibialis anterior muscle atrophy and oxidative capacity reduction is contemporaneous with death of larger lumbar motor neurons in old rats.Physiological reports · 2026Article
- The ageing microenvironment in sarcopenia: early alterations and targeted therapeutic strategies.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Increased life expectancy across developed countries has highlighted the personal and societal value of healthy ageing. A well-functioning neuromuscular system is fundamental to quality of life and functional independence. The systemic deterioration of tissue and organ function during ageing is reflected in the diverse cellular and molecular mechanisms implicated in the age-related loss of muscle mass and strength and its extreme form, termed sarcopenia. Proposed contributors include neurodegeneration, impaired proteostasis, deficient regeneration, systemic hormonal decline, chronic inflammation, and dysregulation of muscle-resident cell populations such as muscle stem cells, fibro-adipogenic progenitors and immune cells. Recent efforts have added granularity to our understanding of the molecular response of muscle to ageing and started to unravel the cellular origins of these signals. Advancements in cell-targeting strategies (e.g. AAV capsids and antibody-targeted therapeutics) are opening new avenues for targeted interventions. Nonetheless, this raises the salient question - what should treatments for age-related muscle wasting target? While anabolic and catabolic signalling within muscle fibres has been the primary target of strategies to counteract age-related muscle loss, these efforts may be futile if impairment in other cell types such as muscle stem cells and motor neurons drive the wasting process. Furthermore, individual differences in activity, nutrition, sex, comorbidities and genetics are likely to influence the predominant mechanisms driving age-related muscle wasting. This multifactorial condition may therefore require a multifactorial solution, with scientists focusing on diverse causal mechanisms to identify and develop effective interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.